-
OJ 9/6, [32] Handwritten postcard from Eugen d'Albert to Schenker, dated September 2,
1900
Eugen d'Albert gives the schedule of forthcoming performances of his
opera.
-
OJ 9/6, [44] Handwritten letter from Eugen d'Albert to Schenker, dated November 8,
1905
In this significant letter, Eugen d'Albert agrees [to help Schenker find
a publisher for his Harmonielehre] and has already written to Brockhaus. He seeks to
interest Schenker in his new opera "Flauto Solo," the première of which, in Prague,
is in four days' time.
-
OJ 9/6, [45a] Handwritten letter from Eugen d’Albert to Schenker, undated [c. November 18,
1905]
Having recommended Schenker's Harmonielehre to J. G. Cotta, publisher,
Eugen d'Albert hands the matter over to Schenker. He proposes a meeting after his
recital on November 23, and thanks Schenker for attending the première of his opera
"Flauto solo" in Prague.
-
OJ 5/15, [1] Incomplete handwritten draft letter from Schenker to Grunsky, dated January 21,
1908
Schenker has not responded to Grunsky's invitation because of pressure of work
with Kontrapunkt. — He thanks Grunsky for his review of Harmonielehre; justifies favoring
the piano repertory there; remarks on Strauss and Reger with respect to "good" and "bad." —
He refers to his Formenlehre as vol. III of his Neue musikalische Theorien und
Phantasien.
-
OC 52/444 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated November 7, 1908
Hertzka details the distribution of first copies of the
Instrumentations-Tabelle. — He makes a bid to publish Kontrapunkt.
-
CA 118 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated August 19, 1910
A fire at his hotel causes Schenker to ask whether Cotta has sent him final
proofs recently. — He inquires whether he might travel to Stuttgart to present his plan for
the Handbibliothek in person.
-
OJ 9/31, [26] Stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated August [20?],
1910
In response to CA 118, Cotta advises Schenker to send his proposal for a
Handbibliothek in advance of a possible visit to Stuttgart to present it in
person.
-
CA 121-122 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated September 10, 1910
Schenker explains the basis for his "Handbibliothek," suggests an overarching
title and a separate title for the proposed first booklet, on Beethoven's Ninth Symphony. He
promises to return the manuscript of vol. II/1.
-
WSLB 66/67 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE) + list of names, dated October 19,
1910
Schenker cancels their Thursday meeting. — He argues for sweeping changes to
the draft contract for Beethovens neunte Sinfonie. — He defends his own free speech in the
face of Universal Edition's commercial interests. As with his Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue
edition, UE will never regret publishing the Ninth Symphony monograph. — He also lauds the
prospective editions of the last five Beethoven piano sonatas and volume of J. S. Bach
toccatas in a lofty vision for future publications. — He appends a list of recipients of
complimentary copies of the Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue.
-
OJ 11/29, [5] Handwritten letter from Grunsky to Schenker, dated December 1, 1910
Grunsky thanks Schenker for the gift of his Chromatische Phantasie und Fuge,
and criticizes it for excessive polemic.
-
WSLB 81 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated September 14,
1911
Schenker demands to know whether UE is interested in publishing his planned
edition of the last five Beethoven piano sonatas; -- Inquires how the proofs of Beethovens
neunte Sinfonie stand; And draws attention to the favorable sales of Kontrapunkt
1.
-
WSLB 90 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated January 1, 1912
Schenker returns proofs of Beethovens Neunte Sinfonie corrected, and draws
attention to errors on the part of the typesetters.
-
WSLB 91 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated January 4, 1912
Schenker returns proofs of Beethovens Neunte Sinfonie corrected, and expresses
dismay at the inaccurate work of the typesetters, notably in type-size, marginal numbers,
and alignment within figures.
-
OJ 5/14, [2] Handwritten draft letter from Schenker to the Gustav Marchet (Gesellschaft der
Musikfreunde), dated September 27, 1912
Schenker details to the President of the Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde, Gustav
Marchet, letters that he has received from the Society's General Secretary, Carl Lafite; he
lodges his complaint at the way in which he has been treated, which he considers impolite and
publicly demeaning, and withdraws his offer of lectures.
-
OJ 11/35, 5 Handwritten letter from Halm to Schenker, dated July 2, 1917
Halm seeks advice on choice of edition for the Beethoven variations, and offers
advice in negotiating with publishers.
-
OJ 11/35, 10 Handwritten letter from Halm to Schenker, dated December 14, 1918
Halm thanks Schenker for assistance over stipend; asks if Schenker has received
compositions sent to him; Halm's post-War prospects may be better.
-
OJ 10/1, [47] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated November 28, 1919
Dahms discusses his future prospects for study, particular where to study (he
discusses conditions in several cities), and with whom. He asks Schenker's advice. He is
resolved to leave Vrieslander because of the latter's pessimism.
-
OJ 10/1, [54] Handwritten postcard from Dahms to Schenker, dated July 12, 1920
Dahms is pleased that Schenker is in the mountains, and hopes for a meeting with
him in Munich on Schenker's way to Stuttgart.
-
OJ 8/3, [89] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 23, 1920
Gives date of return to Vienna, and confirms Tuesday meeting.
-
OJ 11/35, 18b Handwritten letter from Halm to Schenker, dated December 30, 1920
Halm acknowledges letter, sends one newly-published composition, and tells
Schenker of a forthcoming performance of a concerto by him, and three compositions turned down
for publication.
-
OJ 11/35, 19 Handwritten letter from Halm to Schenker, dated July 28, 1921
Halm discusses an "intended gift," and the merits of Matthäus Hentz and K. T. Schmid to
receive it. Halm reports that he has moved from Esslingen to Wickersdorf, and that his Concerto for Large
Orchestra has been performed by Fritz Busch in Stuttgart, and comments on Cotta's hand-over of
Kontrapunkt.
-
OJ 6/7, [2] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated January 29, 1922
Schenker offers to lend Violin his performing materials for two keyboard
concertos by C. P. E. Bach. He inquires about musical life in Hamburg, reports on his most
recent work, continues to despair of his financial situation.
-
OJ 10/1, [73] Typewritten letter from Walter and Margarete Dahms to Schenker, dated December 27,
1922
Dahms has been trying to improve his publishers' financial terms. — He is in
low-grade accommodation; housing in the "German colonies" is available only to officials. —
Reports on the concert season in Rome. — Die Musik would not accept an article from him on
Schenker's teachings. — Comments on a recent article by Paul Bekker, on Emil Hertzka's
"sabotaging" of Schenker, and Furtwängler's lack of whole-hearted support. — Is still working on
his latest book, for which he is arranging a de luxe edition by subscription. — Reports
unfavorably on an incident in which Otto Klemperer played the Italian fascist
hymn.
-
OC 12/7-9 Handwritten letter from Halm to Schenker dated November 6‒10, 1923
Halm has sent the published score of a string quartet to Schenker. —Patronage has
enabled him to publish three volumes of compositions; reports on current and past composition
activities and publications. —Discusses what he has learned from Schenker's theories, and
questions whether it would be a fault were Bruckner's symphonies not to contain the Urlinie;
Halm's book on Bruckner's symphonies has gone into its second edition. —Halm suspects that
Schenker may not "agree with" his compositions, and asks whether Schenker wishes to receives
further scores. —Halm considers socialism a "historical necessity."
-
OJ 11/35, 23 Handwritten letter from Halm to Schenker, dated April 6 and 15, 1925
Halm explains why he has not written before and reports successful performance
of his A major Symphony; wishes Schenker luck with move from UE to Drei-Masken Verlag;
reports events at Freie Schulgemeinde.
-
OJ 6/7, [23] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 26, 1925
Two weeks after arriving in Galtür for the summer holidays, Schenker reports that
he has caught up on his sleep and has already dictated an essay on Reger's Variations and Fugue
on a Theme of J. S. Bach, Op. 81. He will not allow the legal wrangle with Universal Edition to
interfere with his holiday, but he is annoyed about not having been paid by Drei Masken Verlag
for the manuscript of Meisterwerk 1. He has responded to a critique of his Erläuterungsausgabe
of Op. 110, in an essay in Meisterwerk 1, but will not pursue other attacks upon his work and
those of his pupils. The Schenker medallion designed by Alfred Rothberger is going to a second
impression; but the mezzotint portrait by Viktor Hammer, which Jeanette finds a superior work,
has not yet been printed. Throughout the letter, Schenker urges Violin to bring his family to
Galtür sometime during the summer.
-
OJ 6/7, [32] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated February 16, 1927, with postscript
from Fanny Violin
Replying to Violin's previous letter, Schenker expresses surprise about (Egon)
Pollak's enthusiasm for C. P. E. Bach's Double Concerto. He also expresses uncertainty about
whether to accept an honor from the Academy of Arts and Science in Vienna. A translation and
adaptation of part of his Counterpoint, vol. 2, has been prepared; and Herman Roth's book on
counterpoint has also been published. He sends little Karl a picture of himself, and leaves
space for Violin's sister Fanny to add a short greeting.
-
OJ 5/7a, [10] (formerly vC 10) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated June 1, 1927
Schenker congratulates Cube on appointment to professorship; reports that Oppel
has been appointed to a professorship at the Leipzig Conservatory, and on the spread of
Schenker's theory elsewhere; looks forward to visit from Cube.
-
OJ 11/54, [18] Handwritten letter from van Hoboken to Schenker, dated September 18, 1927
Van Hoboken reports on his visit to John Petrie Dunn: his career, his grasp of
Schenker's theory, his situation at Edinburgh University, his publications. — Tomorrow he is to
visit C. S. Terry.
-
WSLB-Hds 191.568 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Deutsch, dated August 23, 1930
Schenker is sending Deutsch copies of letters written by Leo Kestenberg
praising his theories for their practical application to composition and
performance, noting that Furtwängler is championing his cause everywhere. -- He then
launches into a tirade against the city of Vienna for snubbing him and his
work.