OJ 11/36, [1] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker dated September 12, 1913
Hammer approaches Schenker regarding piano lessons for his wife.
OJ 11/36, [2] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker dated September 17, [1913]
Hammer cannot afford Schenker's fee; he dislikes the modern piano and has a Stein
grand piano, a Hammerklavier copy, and a clavichord.
OJ 11/36, [3] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker undated [September 26, 1913]
Hammer regrets Schenker's refusal to teach his wife.
OJ 11/36, [4] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker, dated December 9, 1921
Hammer owns several of Schenker's books and is beginning to understand their
concepts.
JOB 94-3, [1] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer dated December 19, 1921
Schenker seeks to articulate the difference between the painter's and the
composer's work as regards the Urlinie, using the terms "Ton" (vs. "Farbe"), "Tonkörper,"
and "Linie".
JOB 94-3, [1] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer dated December 19, 1921
Schenker seeks to articulate the difference between the painter's and the
composer's work as regards the Urlinie, using the terms "Ton" (vs. "Farbe"), "Tonkörper,"
and "Linie".
JOB 94-3, [1] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer dated December 19, 1921
Schenker seeks to articulate the difference between the painter's and the
composer's work as regards the Urlinie, using the terms "Ton" (vs. "Farbe"), "Tonkörper,"
and "Linie".
OJ 11/36, [5] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker dated March 23, 1922
Hammer praises Schenker's edition of Bach's Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue,
raising an issue about fingering on the clavichord.— He inquires after Tonwille 2, and hopes to
visit Schenker in Vienna soon.
JOB 94-3, [2] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer dated May 25, 1922
Schenker sends a sketch of Mendelssohn's "Altdeutsches Lied"; — justifies an
instance of his fingering questioned by Hammer; — complains about Hertzka; — promises to
read Fiedler and Hildebrand.
OJ 11/36, [6] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker dated May 29, 1922
Hammer thanks Schenker for his letter and generosity, and invites Heinrich and
Jeanette to visit, suggesting May 31; — proofs of his monograph have arrived.
JOB 94-3, [3] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hammer dated May 29, 1922
Schenker accepts Hammer's invitation for May 31.
OJ 11/36, [7] Handwritten postcard from Hammer to Schenker, postmarked May 30, 1922
Hammer changes time of Schenker visit.
JOB 94-3, [4] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hammer dated January 21, 1923
Schenker alerts Hammer to the publication of Tonwille 3.
OJ 11/36, [8] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker dated October 22, 1923
Hammer buys all Schenker's publications, including Tonwille, but admits he has
difficulty understanding Schenker's Harmonielehre; — asks for loan of Halm's [Klavierübung]; —
gives his forthcoming dates;— comments on the lute and its tablature; — considers Busoni's
[Entwurf] wrong-headed.
JOB 94-3, [5] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer dated October 24, 1923
Schenker invites Hammer and his wife for November 7; — The problem of the
"middleman" (performer, etc.) in music, by contrast with painting; — he reports on Hertzka's
proposal to make Tonwille a quarterly publication.
OJ 11/36, [9] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker undated [October 25, 1923]
Hammer sympathizes with the composer's dilemma over middlemen, but points to
cases in which the painter has suffered a similar fate.
OJ 11/36, [10] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker dated November 25, 1923
Hammer thanks Schenker for hospitality on November 7, and recommends Eugen
Steinhof for lessons.
JOB 94-3, [6] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer dated December 2, 1923
Schenker has heard nothing from Eugen Steinhof; — he commends Hammer's
reaction to Halm's work, and comments unfavorably on the latter's musicianship, character,
and opinions; — he writes disparagingly of Robert Brünauer.
OJ 11/36, [11] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker, dated January 5, 1923 [recte
1924]
Hammer refers to the making of a portrait; — he discusses German and Austrian art
with respect to Italian and French; — he comments favorably on Der Tonwille, but defends the art
of the French.
JOB 94-3, [7] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer dated January 13, 1924
Schenker responds to a long letter from Hammer by, first, agreeing to his
proposal to sittings for a portrait, and, second, saying that there is no one in music now
capable of judging the artistry of musicians. Schenker feels he has uniquely this ability,
but others in music do not understand him.
OJ 11/37, [2] Printed invitation to the 76th Exhibition, Union of Artists of the Vienna Secession,
undated [received February 5, 1924]
Invitation to an exhibition of works by Leopold Bauer and Victor
Hammer
OJ 11/36, [12] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker, dated May 1, 1924
Hammer invites Schenker to a first sitting for his portrait.
JOB 94-3, [8] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer dated May 3, 1924
Schenker agrees to come on May 27 to sit for his portrait, and tells Hammer of
the forthcoming historical Beethoven Ninth Symphony concert.
OJ 11/36, [13] Handwritten postcard from Hammer to Schenker, postmarked May 21, 1924
Hammer reschedules the next sitting for the portrait.
OJ 11/36, [15] Handwritten postcard from Hammer to Schenker, dated June 16, 1924
Hammer invites Schenker to resume sitting for his portrait.
OJ 11/36, [16] Handwritten postcard from Hammer to Schenker, postmarked June 17, 1924
Hammer sets the arrival time for the portrait sitting on June
18.
JOB 94-3, [9] Handwritten picture postcard from Heinrich and Jeanette Schenker to Hammer, dated
July 19 [1924]
Heinrich and Jeanette send greetings from the Tyrol; they are expecting the
Vrieslanders.
OJ 9/12, [2] Handwritten letter from Carl Bamberger to Schenker, dated February 18,
1925
Bamberger reports that after six months of repetiteur work he has been granted
some conducting. -- He laments the lack of musical education of the Danzig citizens, and its
impact on the theater's repertory. Talent is not appreciated by the theater's
administrators. He wants to move on from Danzig, suggesting Dessau. -- He reports on his
reading of Der Tonwille, and his success in encouraging others to subscribe. -- He asks
Schenker a question about Schubert's song "Wohin?"
OJ 11/36, [17] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker, dated March 1, 1925
Hammer describes his travels and work in the past eight months, and compares the
piano playing of Otto Vrieslander with that of Schenker.
JOB 94-3, [10] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer dated March 12, 1925
Wherever Hammer may travel, Schenker declares, he will never lose his
Germanness. Schenker asserts the superiority post-WWI of the German nation over those of the
west. -- He describes his own pianism: his "fingers are like musical brains." -- He gives an
account of the dispute with Universal Edition and the outcome of negotiations with Drei
Masken Verlag.
OJ 6/7, [20] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated May 4, 1925
In a wide-ranging letter, Schenker sends Violin money for arranging the order of
Der Tonwille (which must consist of multiple copies of Tonwille 1); Hertzka's representative,
Robert Scheu, is currently studying the papers relating to Schenker's threat of legal action.
Schenker continues to express his astonishment at Furtwängler's ignorance of sonata form, a fact
that does not prevent him from earning huge fees for conducting in New York. He has turned down
a request from a lady who teaches in New York and a former pupil (now in St. Gallen), who wish
to spend some time with him in Galtür. He enquires about the personal difficulties that Violin
writes about in his letter, and asks him to say more; they will invite his sister for a visit.
He will send him a copy of the medallion (designed by Alfred Rothberger); the portrait by Viktor
Hammer is not yet finished.
JOB 94-3, [11] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Hammer, dated July 26, 1925
Schenker inquires as to Hammer's whereabouts, referring to a current scandal
surrounding the Albertina gallery in Vienna. He asks about "the first
print."
OJ 6/7, [23] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 26, 1925
Two weeks after arriving in Galtür for the summer holidays, Schenker reports that
he has caught up on his sleep and has already dictated an essay on Reger's Variations and Fugue
on a Theme of J. S. Bach, Op. 81. He will not allow the legal wrangle with Universal Edition to
interfere with his holiday, but he is annoyed about not having been paid by Drei Masken Verlag
for the manuscript of Meisterwerk 1. He has responded to a critique of his Erläuterungsausgabe
of Op. 110, in an essay in Meisterwerk 1, but will not pursue other attacks upon his work and
those of his pupils. The Schenker medallion designed by Alfred Rothberger is going to a second
impression; but the mezzotint portrait by Viktor Hammer, which Jeanette finds a superior work,
has not yet been printed. Throughout the letter, Schenker urges Violin to bring his family to
Galtür sometime during the summer.
OJ 11/36, [18] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker, dated August 18, 1925
Hammer enloses a first pull of the mezzotint of Schenker, but expresses
dissatisfaction with it. Gives his itinerary.
JOB 94-3, [12] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer, dated August 23, [1925]
Heinrich and Jeanette consider the test proof of the Schenker mezzotint
finished and urge him to finalize it. Heinrich tells Hammer about Anthony van
Hoboken.
OJ 8/4, [39] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, undated, postmarked
August 27, 1925
Schenker sends greetings from the Tyrol, reports the publication of an article
on him by Elsa Bienenfeld, which includes a reproduction of his pupil Alfred Rothberger's
bronze medallion.
OJ 11/36, [19] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker, dated September 1, 1925
Hammer explains why he can't just take the test print of his Schenker
mezzotint as the final product. -- He speaks of money difficulties.
JOB 94-3, [13] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer, dated September 8, 1925
Heinrich discusses the drawing from which the Schenker mezzotint was made, and
its prospects for sale. The Keilgasse house is undergoing deep cleaning.
JOB 94-3, [14] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer, dated September 9, 1925
Schenker informs Hammer that the drawing from which the Schenker mezzotint was
made has been sold.
OJ 11/36, [20] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker, dated September 11, 1925
Hammer is working on the plate of the Schenker mezzotint.
OJ 11/36, [21] Handwritten postcard from Hammer to Schenker, dated September 17, 1925
Hammer asks for a short sitting the next day.
OJ 11/36, [22] Handwritten postcard from Hammer to Schenker, dated September 17, 1925
Hammer asks for a short sitting the next day.
OJ 9/12, [5] Handwritten letter from Carl Bamberger to Schenker, dated September 27,
1925
Bamberger is officially a "conductor" at Danzig. -- He asks how to obtain a
Rothberger medallion of Schenker and inquires after Hammer's etching. -- He reports on
Hupka's progress in Cologne, and inquires after F.E. von Cube.
OJ 9/8, [1] Handwritten letter from Wilhelm Altmann to Schenker, dated October 3,
1925
Altmann asks Schenker to send his [Hammer] portrait to the editor of Die
Musik.
JOB 94-3, [15] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer, continued by Weisse, dated October 5,
1925
Schenker informs Hammer that he has recommended Otto Vrieslander as the author
of a short article about him to accompany the Hammer mezzotint for publication in the
journal Die Musik. Weisse continues the letter, ordering prints of the mezzotint for
Schenker and himself, and detailing arrangements for payment.
OJ 11/36, [23] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker, dated October 6, 1925
Hammer encloses as a gift two prints of his mezzotint of Schenker; Weisse will
convey to Schenker a print from which the printing block of the mezzotint can be made for
Die Musik's purposes. -- The Albertina has just purchased one of the
proofs.
OJ 15/15, [19] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated October 7, 1925
Weisse asks Schenker to look at some suitable frames for Hammer's portrait of
him. He reports that several autograph manuscripts of Brahms are being put up for sale, of
which that of the cadenzas Brahms wrote for Beethoven's Fourth Concerto are particularly
interesting. He quotes from a letter by Gerald Warburg, indicating that Schenker's latest
theoretical concepts are being taught at Damrosch's music school in New
York.
JOB 94-3, [16] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer, dated November [recte October] 11,
1925
Schenker reports that the tube [containing a print of the mezzotint portrait
of him, for making a printing block] has been sent to the publisher [of Die Musik], and he
now waits to see whether the latter will commission an article to accompany it. He comments
on the Albertina's purchase of a print of the portrait.
JOB 94-3, [17] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hammer, dated October 18, 1925
Schenker quotes Schuster's response acknowledging receipt of the portrait and
anticipates publishing it [in Die Musik], perhaps with an accompanying
essay.
OJ 6/7, [25] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 25, 1925
In this wide-ranging letter, Schenker commiserates with Violin about the high
cost of living, and his inability to raise his fees to keep up with it (in particular, he
feels unable to ask the wealthy Hoboken to pay more than his other pupils). He reports on
sales of a medallion bearing his image, and the imminent arrival of a mezzotint of his
portrait, made by Viktor Hammer, of which his brother Moses Schenker has bought the original
drawing. Vrieslander will write an essay about his work in Die Musik, accompanied by the
portrait, and things are now going well with the corrections to Meisterwerk 1 and the
writing of Meisterwerk 2.
OJ 10/3, [44] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated November 22, 1925
Deutsch enjoyed today's afternoon tea at the Schenkers and will return the Vrieslander and Hammer
books to Schenker tomorrow. He asks Schenker to speak to Hoboken about the possibility of him purchasing
Deutsch's collection of Schubert first editions.
OJ 10/1, [91] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated December 1, 1925
The [Hammer] mezzotint has arrived; Dahms expresses a reservation about
it. — He has been writing for Die Musik. — He succeeded in getting compensation from UE.
OJ 8/4, [40] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated December 21,
1925
Interrupting his correcting of the proofs for the first Meisterwerk Yearbook,
Schenker sends Christmas greetings to the Violins, and informs his friend that an
out-of-court settlement was made with Universal Edition. Recent concert appearances of the
cellist Buxbaum and the violinist van der Berg give him reason to believe that their trio
concerts with Violin will be successful. He has arranged for Hammer’s portrait of him to be
sent to Hamburg.
OJ 14/45, [47] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated December 25, 1925
Catching up on his correspondence on Christmas Day, Violin thanks Schenker for
his recent postcard, and hopes that 1926 will be a less troublesome year for him. He quotes
an extract from a negative review of Berg's Wozzeck, and reports on his practice and
rehearsal plans for the trios that he will perform with van der Berg and Buxbaum in a
month's time.
OJ 6/7, [27] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated January 15, 1926
Schenker agrees to to teach Violin's pupil Agnes Becker twice a week, as soon
as she is ready to come to Vienna. He reports Furtwängler's disillusionment with modern
music, and notes that Weingartner and Julius Korngold have expressed similar sentiments. He
is not optimistic that humanity in general will truly understand the classics, which
underscores the important of his (and Violin's) mission.
OJ 14/45, [111] Handwritten postcard from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated March 13, 1926
Violin thanks Schenker for Hammer's excellent portrait of him, which has
finally arrived.
OJ 5/7a, [5] (formerly vC 5) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, undated [c. October 7, 1926]
Schenker praises Cube's talent as a writer; informs Cube of forthcoming article on Schenker by
Vrieslander with portrait by Hammer; expresses his wish that Cube's father would pay all that he owes
him.
OJ 6/7, [32] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated February 16, 1927, with postscript
from Fanny Violin
Replying to Violin's previous letter, Schenker expresses surprise about (Egon)
Pollak's enthusiasm for C. P. E. Bach's Double Concerto. He also expresses uncertainty about
whether to accept an honor from the Academy of Arts and Science in Vienna. A translation and
adaptation of part of his Counterpoint, vol. 2, has been prepared; and Herman Roth's book on
counterpoint has also been published. He sends little Karl a picture of himself, and leaves
space for Violin's sister Fanny to add a short greeting.
OJ 10/3, [61] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated May 9, 1927
Deutsch asks Schenker to lend him the April 1927 issue of Der Schriftsteller.
He is grateful for having been introduced to the artist Viktor Hammer. He recommends that
Schenker visit the Beethoven exposition in the City Hall, and also the Planetarium, where an
“optical organ” is on display.
OJ 10/3, [63] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated June 4, 1927
Deutsch has found a reference to the autograph manuscript of Beethoven’s Piano
Sonata in G, Op. 79, and tells Schenker he can find out more about it from the British
Museum. The Hammers are visiting him on Wednesday (June 8), and he hopes that the Schenkers
will be able to join them.
OJ 6/7, [34] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated June 30, 1927
Schenker answers Violin's birthday greetings letter philosophically. He is
able to work on the final version Der freie Satz at leisure and in good spirits. He reports
on the establishment of an archive of photographic reproductions of autograph and gives an
account of a visit from Violin's sister Fanny: in return for a picture of Karl Violin, he is
enclosing two pictures of himself and one of Jeanette. Finally, he urges his friend to spend
part of the summer in Galtür.
OJ 15/15, [28] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated January 25, 1928
Weisse accepts a social invitation from Schenker, asks whether Viktor Hammer
might also join them.
OJ 9/34, [10] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated January 30, 1928
Cube reports progress in his class and private teaching, performance of his
compositions, his forthcoming lecture; outlines plan for an exhibition in Duisburg to celebrate
Schenker's 60th birthday; has heard nothing of Hoboken's "Aufruf."
OJ 89/2, [5] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated March 26, 1928
Schenker conveys Deutsch's response to van Hoboken's questioning of a planned
facsimile of Schubert sketches. — Schenker discusses strategy for persuading Paris to supply
photographs for the Photogrammarchiv.
OJ 9/34, [11] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated April 24, 1928
Cube describes difficulties with his colleagues, loss of pupils, and reactions to
his lecture; Scheuermann and Schmemann will put Schenker exhibits in their shop windows, items
requested; inquires after Weisse journal plan.
OJ 5/7a, [14] (formerly vC 14) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated April 29, 1928
Schenker sympathizes with Cube over the hostilities he faces; contrasts his own theory to the
approach of Riemann. Has arranged for Hammer portraits to be sent to Cube [for bookshop exhibits], and directs him
to biographical information about himself. Describes the trials of his 20s, which were surpassed by the difficulties
he faced later with publishers and organizations. Upholds Joachim and Messchaert as models of performance art, and
speaks of his contact with Brahms. Asks whether Cube will be joining him in Galtür in the summer.
OJ 9/34, [12] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated May 24, 1928
Cube acknowledges receipt of the Hammer engravings and reports on the planned
Scheuermann exhibition; reports on a forthcoming lecture and seminar, and the growth of his
student numbers.
OJ 9/34, [13] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated July 6, 1928
Cube reports on Scheuermann exhibit, and consequent interest and sales, encloses
associated newspaper article; also on recent lecturing and composition activity. He is unlikely
to visit Schenker this year; recalls people at Galtür.
OJ 5/7a, [17] (formerly vC 17) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated July 13, 1928
Schenker offers consoling words for low turn-out to Düsseldorf lecture; praises
recent article by Cube, but corrects overstated connection between himself and Brahms and
Joachim.
OJ 15/16, [59] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated July 26, 1928
Writing while on holiday (in Bad Aussee), Weisse apologizes for not having
replied to Schenker's previous letter. He is enjoying reading C. P. E. Bach's Versuch, and
reports the illness and recovery of Viktor Hammer, who was staying in Grundlsee near the Weisses
during the month of June.
OJ 9/34, [14] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated October 4, 1928
Cube acknowledges OJ 5/7a, [18] and [19], and comments; reports on his own recent activities and
plans, and on events in the Conservatory, on a forthcoming Schubert festival, and Radio Vienna. He is about to
return the Hammer etching.
OJ 5/32, [1] Postal receipt from Schenker to Rinn, dated January 23, 1930
Schenker sends the Hammer portrait to Rinn.
OJ 13/25, [9] Typewritten letter from Rinn to Schenker, dated March 8, 1930
Vrieslander's article about Schenker for Der Kunstwart is too technical and
too long for a journal with amateur readership; he has asked Vrieslander to shorten it. — He
expresses enthusiasm for Schenker's idea of writing about the relationship of the great
German poets to music.
OJ 13/25, [10] Typewritten letter from Rinn to Schenker, dated May 15, 1930
Rinn sends a copy of Vrieslander's article on Schenker, which will appear in
the next issue of Der Kunstwart. — He looks forward to receiving Schenker's essay on German
poets and music, and hopes that Schenker will consider writing some commentary-style pieces
for him.
OJ 15/16, [91] Handwritten letter from Hans Weisse to Schenker, dated March 30, 1933
In this long letter, Weisse expresses his bitter regret about Otto
Vrieslander's reaction to his criticism of a recently published collection of his
(Vrieslander's) songs, and to Schenker's exaggerated claims of their worth. Weisse defends
his critical stance on the grounds that objective discussions are the only worthwhile ones,
and that he took the trouble to write about the songs in a 14-page letter to Vrieslander
only for the sake of art (in the Schenkerian sense) and feels hurt both by Vrieslander's
personal reaction to Weisse's criticism and by Schenker's defence of the older pupil. — In
the final paragraph, he inquires again about gaining permission to make multiple copies of
Schenker's foreground graph of the "Eroica" Symphony.