-
OJ 9/10a, [1] Handwritten letter from Hermann Bahr to Schenker, dated July 4, 1895
Article can be split across two issues, though with
disadvantages.
-
OJ 13/29, [2] Handwritten letter from Rosenthal to Schenker, dated May 26, 1896
Rosenthal thanks Schenker for his words of friendship.
-
OJ 11/42, [28] Handwritten postcard from Harden to Schenker, postmarked April 7, 1897
Harden has already accepted an article.
-
OJ 15/12, [B] Handwritten calling card from Weinberger to Schenker, undated
Thanks (unspecified)
-
OJ 15/12, [C] Handwritten calling card from Weinberger to Schenker, undated
Weinberger offers his services to Schenker.
-
OJ 9/3, [1] Handwritten letter from Guido Adler to Schenker, dated October 25, 1901
The Vienna chapter of the International Music Society invites Schenker to give
a lecture.
-
OJ 13/29, [6] Handwritten letter from Rosenthal to Schenker, dated December 14, 1902
Rosenthal identifies Fritzi Neumann, and explains the background to her
application.
-
OC 52/9 Typewritten letter from Robitschek and Winter (UE) to Schenker, dated July 23,
1903
UE offers Schenker the arrangement of Handel organ concertos.
-
OJ 14/15, [2] Handwritten letter from Schoenberg to Schenker, undated [September 15,
1903?]
Schoenberg accepts Schenker's offer [unspecified], and hopes to see him in Vienna
two days later.
-
OJ 14/15, [8] Handwritten letter from Zemlinsky, Gutheil, and Schoenberg to Schenker, dated January,
1904
Invitation to attend a meeting to discuss the promotion of new music in Vienna
through education and performance.
-
OJ 11/17, [1] Handwritten letter from Eduard Gärtner to Schenker, undated [August/September
1904?]
Eduard Gärtner welcomes the chance to hear some of Schenker's Lieder played,
and asks if Schenker could visit him in Reichenau.
-
CA 41-42 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated October 1, 1906
Schenker goes back on his earlier agreement with Cotta, and makes an
impassioned case for including the "Nachwort" as Section 3 of Part II of
Harmonielehre.
-
OJ 5/35, [1] Handwritten draft letter from Schenker to Ernst Rudorff, dated January 21,
1908
Schenker makes a first approach to Rudorff; it concerns interpretation of a
passage in Chopin's Ballade No. 2, Op. 38; — He asserts his belief in consulting -- and
teaching students to consult -- only original sources, and in the Urtext
principle.
-
OC 52/421 Typewritten contract (carbon copy) between Schenker and UE, dated June 30,
1908
Contract for Schenker's Instrumentations-Tabelle
-
WSLB 13 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated August 13, 1908
Schenker reluctantly agrees to October for publishing the Instrumentation
Table.
-
OC 52/444 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated November 7, 1908
Hertzka details the distribution of first copies of the
Instrumentations-Tabelle. — He makes a bid to publish Kontrapunkt.
-
OC 52/402 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated March 21, 1909
Hertzka raises several possibilities for amplifying the
Instrumentations-Tabelle, and calls for a meeting.
-
WSLB 47 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated November 9, 1909
Schenker resists attending a meeting with Hertzka and von Wöß regarding the
printing of his edition of the Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue; asserts his rights as an
author to control over his own material; and makes claims for the introduction to his
Instrumentations-Tabelle, which was not accepted for inclusion in 1908
reprinting.
-
OC 52/70 Postal receipt for item from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), postmarked April 30,
1911
Postal receipt for item of April 30, 1911 sent to UE.
-
OJ 11/17, [2] Handwritten letter from Eduard Gärtner to Schenker, dated July 14, 1912
Eduard Gärtner regrets that he is unable to help.
-
OC 52/98 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated September 16,
1912
In sending the first installment of Schenker's honorarium for the Last Five
Sonatas of Beethoven, Hertzka apologizes for its delay. — He asks for a meeting about the
Organization.
-
GdM Exh.332, [3] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Carl Lafite (Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde), dated
September 20, 1912
Schenker turns down Lafite's proposal in polemical manner.
-
GdM Exh.332, [4] Handwritten letter from Carl Lafite (Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde) to Schenker,
dated September 20, 1912
Lafite rejects Schenker's rebukes and regrets that because of the tone of
Schenker's letter he is unable to pursue any further a yearlong course that he had had in
mind for the next season.
-
OC 52/100 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated September 27,
1912
Hertzka has tried and failed to telephone Dr. Harpner because he is
ill.
-
OJ 5/14, [2] Handwritten draft letter from Schenker to the Gustav Marchet (Gesellschaft der
Musikfreunde), dated September 27, 1912
Schenker details to the President of the Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde, Gustav
Marchet, letters that he has received from the Society's General Secretary, Carl Lafite; he
lodges his complaint at the way in which he has been treated, which he considers impolite and
publicly demeaning, and withdraws his offer of lectures.
-
OC 52/102 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated October 3, 1912
Hertzka gives his reaction to a letter from Hugo Heller to
Schenker.
-
OC 52/104 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated October 23, 1912
Hertzka will speak with Harpner next week.
-
OC 52/105 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated November 9, 1912
Hertzka returns the compositions by Hans Weisse submitted for consideration,
giving reasons. — He has to stand aside for a time from the "Alliance" [recte Organization]
on health grounds.
-
OC 52/495 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated November 28, 1912
Hertzka is sending another copy of Beethoven Op. 109, and is pleased to hear
of Schenker's discoveries. -- He asks for a discussion regarding the proposed "Alliance"
[recte "Organization"], on which he has some new ideas. -- He may look again at Hans
Weisse's music in 1913.
-
OC 1A/16-17 Handwritten letter (carbon copy) from Schenker to Newlov, dated September 16,
1913
Schenker regrets that he is unable to offer Newlov lessons in the coming
season.
-
OJ 5/27, [2] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Evelina Pairamall, dated November 12,
1913
Schenker thanks Evelina Pairamall warmly for sending him an article by
Saint-Saens on manuscripts in Berlin, which covers an autograph manuscript of Beethoven's Ninth
Symphony, and reports to her his own work on another autograph of that work. -- He asks if she
is returning to Vienna soon, and promises to show her his discoveries, concluding with a joke
employing musical technical terms.
-
OC B/176 Handwritten letter from Albert Kopfermann (Königliche Bibliothek zu Berlin) to
Schenker, dated November 18, 1913
Kopfermann provides an estimate for the photography of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony
that Schenker has requested; and notifies him of another source of this work in the Library's
holdings.
-
OJ 10/1, [2] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated March 27, 1914
Dahms wishes to start his musical studies afresh in Schenker's "shool," asks
whether there is anyone in Berlin who can teach him, also explores the possibility of coming to
Vienna.
-
OJ 10/1, [3] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated April 13, 1914
Schenker outlines his financial situation and rehearses alternative plans for
study with Schenker.
-
OJ 10/1, [6] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated July 15, 1914
Dahms communicates from the Black Forest, commiserating over Schenker's
experiences with the Vienna Konzerthausgesellschaft.
-
OJ 15/34, [2] Handwritten letter from Viktor Zuckerkandl to Heinrich Schenker, undated [August 20,
1915]
Zuckerkandl reports on life in the military.
-
OJ 10/1, [13] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, undated but presumably November 1,
1915
Dahms acknowledges Schenker's letter with joy; he is committed to the struggle
against the "other side."
-
OJ 10/1, [14] Handwritten field postcard from Dahms to Schenker, dated January 8, 1916
Dahms is able to do some work, longs for peace, looks forward to Op.
111.
-
OJ 10/1, [16] Handwritten field postcard from Dahms to Schenker, dated February 21, 1916
Visit to Vienna has to be deferred.
-
OJ 10/1, [19] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, undated but presumably May 1,
1916
Dahms laments the state of music and criticism in Berlin. — When the war is over
he plans to draw a line under his life so far and start again.
-
OJ 10/1, [21] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated June 30, 1916
Dahms holds out hope for the position of music critic at Der Abend of Vienna,
about which Schenker has inquired.— He reviews his past work; coming to Vienna is
imperative.
-
OJ 10/1, [22] Handwritten postcard from Dahms to Schenker, dated November [recte August] 9,
1916
Dahms hopes to be going to Wilna.
-
OJ 10/1, [23] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated August 27, 1916
Dahms may be posted to Wilna, or may be discharged. He asks about the position of
music critic at the Vienna Der Abend.
-
OJ 10/1, [25] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated November 26, 1916
Dahms reports on his situation, and seeks Schenker's interest in a forthcoming
lecture in Vienna by Willi von Möllendorf.
-
OJ 11/35, 1 Handwritten letter from Halm to Schenker, dated January 4, 1917
Halm reports on his recent and forthcoming publications
-
OJ 10/1, [26] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated March 2, 1917
Dahms's nerves are bad and he has difficulty doing any serious reading. —
Moellendorf has sent a review of the quarter-tone harmonium, and Dahms
comments.
-
OJ 10/1, [27] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated March 18, 1917
Dahms reacts to Schenker's suggestion of a stipendium for study in
Vienna.
-
DLA 69.930/1 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Halm, July 8, 1917
Schenker acknowledges Halm's letter; he discusses the relative merits of editions
of Beethoven variations, and looks forward to seeing Halm's review of his "Beethoven editions";
he is putting the finishing touches to Kontrapunkt 2.
-
OJ 6/6, [5] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Valerie Violin, dated December 30, 1917
In response to the Violins' condolences on the death of his mother, Schenker
reflects sadly on her life and needs between 1890 and the late 1910s, attributing blame largely
to his younger brother Moriz, less to his older brother Wilhelm; — He explains why he and
Jeanette are unable to visit the Violins in the cold and without adequate
clothing.
-
OJ 5/38, [1] Handwritten letter from Heinrich Schenker and Jeanette Kornfeld to Wilhelm Schenker,
dated January 24, 1918
Heinrich comments on the attack of the mumps, from which Wilhelm's children are
suffering. Heinrich encourages Wilhelm and his family to move from Kautzen permanently, and in
that connection will investigate the cost of having Julia Schenker's body moved from Waidhofen
to Vienna for burial with the cooperation of the Vienna Kultusgemeinde. He envisions purchasing
burial plots for Jeanette and himself adjacent to Julia's grave. He thanks Dodi for her
invitation to stay with them if Vienna becomes intolerable.
-
OJ 14/45, [10] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated February 5,
1918
Schenker, Violin alleges, has accused him of a dearth of subject matter in letter
writing; Violin defends himself on grounds that his life has been disrupted by military service
and the impact of that on his physical and mental state. He accuses Schenker of insensitivity,
and treating him like his pupils. He defends his wife for giving food to the Schenkers, and
explains her motivation for so doing.
-
OJ 5/38, [2] Handwritten letter from Heinrich Schenker and Jeanette Kornfeld to Wilhelm and Dodi
Schenker, dated February 5, 1918
Heinrich relays back the price of transferring Julia Schenker's body from
Waidhofen to Vienna, and would hope to get a discount on that price via the Jewish Religious
Community. He reports on the planned Festschrift for his 50th birthday, and his current troubles
with UE. Jeanette characterizes their life as "farcical," and asks Dodi's advice in obtaining
twine for repairing shirts. She comments on the Versailles Council of War as confirming
Heinrich's warnings.
-
DLA 69.930/3 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Halm, dated February 7, 1918
Schenker writes scathingly of UE's business practices; describes his
counter-tactics, and his experiences over Niloff, Instrumentations-Tabelle. He will read all of
Halm's writings and asks for a reading-list
-
OC 1 B/34r Handwritten draft letter from Schenker to Türkel, dated February 24, 1918
Schenker addresses legal obstructions regarding Sofie Deutsch's will, and
threatens to go back on an earlier disclaimer if he continues to be deprived of the inheritance
due to him; notifies Türkel that he has already paid out the first stipend, to Otto Vrieslander,
and has promised the second and third to two composers (unnamed).
-
OJ 6/6, [7] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated March 20, 1918
[50th Festschrift:] Schenker intends not to influence anyone in their decision to
contribute or not. — [Personal issues:] Schenker agrees to draw a line under issues discussed in
OJ 6/6, [6]; however, he accounts for his epistolary silence regarding Valerie Violin, including
the possible contact with Seligmann; he attempts to explain the matter of the jars of jam and
the absence of visits to Schönbrunn, describing vividly how tirelessly Jeanette works and how
dependent they both are on Sunday for work time; he expresses outrage that he and Jeanette live
so poorly while his pupils live lives of luxury, commenting bitterly on state of play over the
Sofie Deutsch stipend; he wishes the Violins well for their 6-month stay in Marburg.
-
OJ 8/3, [57] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 7, 1918
Schenker has implemented the increase in fee, for his pupils, and describes how
intolerable life is in Vienna; -- is trying with dificulty to book summer lodgings; -- reports
Weisse's declining of the invitation to contribute to the Schenker Festschrift; -- he is working
hard on his library.
-
OJ 8/3, [59] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker and Jeanette Kornfeld to Moriz Violin,
dated May 13, 1918
Schenker thanks Moriz Violin for an address; reports on planned visit to his
brother Wilhelm Schenker, and food promised by him and items sent by Felix Hupka; Heinrich and
Jeanette expect to spend the summer in Vienna.
-
OJ 15/15, [6] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated May 27, 1918
Weisse, on three-month leave (June-August 1918) to finish work towards his
doctoral degree, asks Schenker for tuition in counterpoint and thoroughbass.
-
OJ 11/17, [3] Printed funeral notice for Eduard Gärtner to Schenker, dated July 2, 1918
Announces death and date and time of funeral of Eduard Gärtner.
-
OJ 12/9, [22] Handwritten postcard from Karpath to Schenker, dated July 18, 1918
Karpath regrets that Schenker's letter came too late, and he was unable to act on
it.
-
OJ 12/9, [23] Typewritten letter from Karpath to Schenker, dated July 28, 1918
Karpath contests Schenker's argument that failing to write an obituary for Eduard
Gärtner was a neglect of duty, defends the position of the music critic, and draws attention to
a commemorative article on Gärtner.
-
OJ 8/3, [60] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 28, 1918
Comments on the death of Fritz Wahle and the illness of Eduard Gärtner; is trying
to negotiate the summer in the Tyrol, but may not succeed; congratulates Violin.
-
OJ 10/1, [34] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated July 29, 1918
Dahms thanks Schenker for his long letter; reports on his vacation in Munich and
visit with Vrieslander; he is looking forward to studying with Schenker in Vienna.
-
OJ 14/5, [6] Handwritten fieldpostcard from Moriz Schenker and Hans Guttmann to Heinrich Schenker,
dated August 8, 1918
Moriz Schenker regrets not having spoken to Heinrich but hopes to be in Vienna
again soon; he has Hans Guttmann staying, and has written to Sophie Guttmann; note by Hans
Guttmann.
-
OJ 8/3, [61] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 21, 1918
The Schenkers went to Mariazell on the 16th for a work-free vacation. - -
Schenker has had difficulties with Wilhelm and Moriz Schenker. - - He describes visit to Hupka
in Kapuvár (Hungary). - - Comments on Violin's forthcoming promotion to Lieutenant.
-
OJ 14/5, [7] Handwritten letter from Moriz Schenker to Heinrich Schenker, dated August 28,
1918
Moriz Schenker reports that he has received a letter from Sophie and Salo
Guttmann; he has dispatched flour to Heinrich's Vienna address; he will be in Vienna soon and
hopes to call on Heinrich.
-
OJ 14/5, [8] Handwritten letter from Moriz Schenker to Sophie and Salo Guttmann, dated August 28,
1918
Moriz Schenker promises Sophie and Salo Guttmann that he will help them by
writing to a senior official and guaranteeing their war loan, and asks for details. — He will be
traveling on business and hopes to see Hans Guttmann and Heinrich Schenker.
-
OJ 15/16, [36] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated September 30, 1918
Still in military service, Weisse asks Schenker for advice regarding the
interpretation of the ritardandos in the first movement of Beethoven's Eighth Symphony.
-
DLA 69.930/4 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Halm, dated December 9, 1918
Schenker recounts to Halm how Sofie Deutsch had set up a trust for needy artists,
leaving Schenker to identify beneficiaries. Schenker offers to transfer 1,600 Kroner to him from
this trust.
-
OJ 11/35, 10 Handwritten letter from Halm to Schenker, dated December 14, 1918
Halm thanks Schenker for assistance over stipend; asks if Schenker has received
compositions sent to him; Halm's post-War prospects may be better.
-
OJ 13/10, [6] Handwritten letter from Oppel to Schenker, dated February 19, 1919
Oppel thanks Schenker for EA, Opp. 110 and 111, which he has enjoyed, inquires
after EA, Opp. 101 and 106, and Kontrapunkt 2, and raises a possible thematic link between two
movements of Op. 110 (music example). His plan to study with Schenker has to be deferred; he
will soon send compositions, and asks for unsparing criticism.
-
OJ 10/1, [36] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated March 15, 1919
Dahms is spending time with Otto Vrieslander, working through Schenker's
Harmonielehre with him and preparing himself for study with Schenker. He rejoices at the
crushing of German militarism.
-
WSLB 302 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), May 18, 1919
Schenker reminds Hertzka of Hans Weisse's doctoral dissertation, Der Kunstwalzer,
and recommends it for publication. He laments, in provocatively vulgar language, that the
Viennese have become subservient to the French.
-
OC 52/923 Typed letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated June 6, 1919
Hertzka acknowledges receipt of WSLB 302; he cannot entertain early publication
of Weisse's work but wishes to get to know it now. — He hopes to have work from Schenker's pen
as soon as work for Cotta is finished. — He proposes that the Foreword to Die letzten fünf
Sonaten von Beethoven ... op. 111 be omitted [in an future edition].
-
WSLB 303 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 12, 1919
Schenker promises to send Hans Weisse to see Hertzka. In reacting unfavorably to
Hertzka's suggestions that the Foreword to Die letzten fünf Sonaten von Beethoven, Op. 111 be
discarded for its second edition, Schenker puts up a stout defense of his use of polemic in his
writings, contending that art, life, and politics are inextricably interconnected. He claims
that his pronouncements on politics now will prove correct in the long run. His sole concern is
with the truth; he is not interested in pandering to his readers.
-
OJ 6/6, [10] Handwritten letter from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 17,
1919
Schenker hopes that colleagues will support Moriz Violin. – The court has favored
Emil Kornfeld unduly. – A move to Germany might save Schenker money, but he is uncertain how
many of his pupils would follow him there (only Pairamall has indicated willingness). – He asks
Weisse to act as an intermediary in booking a supply of wood for burning. – Dahms and Weisse are
due for simultanous visits. – He is glad to hear Valerie Violin is better.
-
OJ 8/3, [69] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 31,
1919
Heinrich and Jeanette have official permission to remain at Schloß Tantalier
until September 15. -- They have been exhausted by the visits of Weisse and Dahms. -- Weisse
[meanness] contrasts instructively with Dahms [generosity].
-
OJ 15/16, [40] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated September 1, 1919
Weisse thanks Schenker for his hospitality, and is glad to learn that he and
Jeanette will be able to remain on holiday at Klammerth's castle.
-
OJ 13/10, [7] Handwritten letter from Oppel to Schenker, dated September 7, 1919
Oppel expresses his pessimism in the aftermath of the war and the prospects for
his generation. He sends a chaconne for Schenker's comment, and reports his appointment as a
teacher in theory and composition at the Kiel Conservatory. Alfred Einstein asked him for a
review of the Erläuterungsausgabe, but he declined.
-
OJ 10/3, [2] Typewritten letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated September 8, 1913
Deutsch encloses part of a letter from Ludwig Scheibler, which he says will interest Schenker. He
has finished work on two volumes of his documentary biography.
-
OJ 15/5, [5] Handwritten note from Eberhard von Waechter to Schenker, dated October 11,
1919
Waechter regrets Schenker's refusal to agree to write articles for Der Merker,
and expresses doubts about his "prophetic zeal."
-
OC 1 B/41-45 Handwritten draft letter from Schenker to Eberhard von Waechter, dated October 17,
1919
Schenker addresses the misunderstanding that has arisen, explaining his
willingness to contribute articles to Der Merker once his current projects are in print.
-
OJ 15/5, [6] Handwritten letter from Eberhard von Waechter to Schenker, dated October 19,
1919
Waechter understands Schenker's wish not to pre-publish his Art of Performance in
article form, and hopes that Schenker will provide a universal solution to the performance
problem; explains the editorial control of Der Merker, encouraging Weisse to submit his two
articles to it; expresses pleasure that he has procured from Halm reviews of Schenker's
Harmonielehre and Kontrapunkt 1; is unable to send his Musikkritik der Gegenwart at present.
-
DLA 69.930/8 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Halm, dated October 27, 1919
Schenker writes of the deteriorating intellectual conditions in Germany and
Austria with respect to other nations, and of the devastating political and psychological
consequences. Schenker praises Halm's Klavierübung for its sensitivity to voice leading, and
speaks of it as an antidote to the decline of musical literacy. He hopes to talk with Halm about
these matters when he moves to Germany.
-
OJ 11/16, [E] Handwritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, undated [1928‒30]
Furtwängler cancels meeting on account of illness.
-
OJ 11/16, [1] Handwritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated November [18 or 19,]
1919
Furtwängler prizes Schenker's approval higher than that of others; he is
uncertain what role he is destined to play in the musical life of Vienna; he hopes to talk with
Schenker.
-
OJ 10/1, [47] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated November 28, 1919
Dahms discusses his future prospects for study, particular where to study (he
discusses conditions in several cities), and with whom. He asks Schenker's advice. He is
resolved to leave Vrieslander because of the latter's pessimism.
-
OJ 10/1, [48] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated December 21, 1919
Dahms thanks Schenker for his advice on the next stage of instruction. He wrote
to Halm, who confirmed what Schenker had said. He congratulates Schenker on the superhuman work
that he is doing under current adverse circumstances.
-
OJ 10/3, [5] Handwritten letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated January 8,
1920
Deutsch reports that Hertzka wants the music connoisseur edition of the
"Moonlight" Sonata to include facsimiles only, not textually cleaned editions. Deutsch
outlines the basis of the contract (editors will receive 8% of the retail price) and the
production timetable. He asks if Schenker would rather take on a different facsimile due to
competition from a Copenhagen publisher. Schenker's Theory of Harmony was not it stock in
Vienna.
-
OJ 10/3, [6] Handwritten letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated January 9,
1920
Deutsch is sorry that a customer prevented him for speaking with the Schenkers
when they visited his store. Photographic originals will be needed for the connoisseur
edition.
-
OC 52/446 Typed letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated January 14, 1920
Hertzka has not yet gone to Frankfurt.—- He wants to publish the "Moonlight"
Sonata in a series edited by Otto Erich Deutsch. — Would like to do new edition of complete
Beethoven sonatas, but without wholesale reengraving. — Discusses financial arrangements for the
latter, and for the Kleine Bibliothek. — Encloses the contract for Die letzten fünf Sonaten von
Beethoven ... op. 101.
-
OJ 10/3, [7] Handwritten letter from Otto Erich Deutsch Deutsch to Schenker, dated January 16,
1920
Deutsch will write to the Beethoven House in Bonn to seek permission to
reproduce the manuscript of the "Moonlight" Sonata. He suggests using the first edition as
the source for the missing opening and closing bars, and asks Schenker to refrain from
polemics in his commentary. Copies of the manuscripts of Beethoven's piano sonatas Opp. 28,
109, 110 and 111 should not be difficult to obtain, and he has made inquiries regarding the
manuscripts of Beethoven's Piano Sonata Op. 106 and Mozart's A minor Rondo K.
511.
-
DLA 69.930/9 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Halm, dated January 18, 1920
Schenker acknowledges receipt of OJ 11/35, 14 and 15, thanking Halm for the
opportunity to see the two contracts, now enclosed. Schenker has been exploited by UE regarding
EA 101 and the "Little Library," and must now protect himself and extract better working
conditions. —Kontrapunkt 2 will show the world that his "Semper idem" motto applies at every
level from strict counterpoint through to free composition. In a musical garden of Eden of
genius, the rest of the world behaves like Adam and Eve. — Schenker congratulates Halm on his
successes and thanks him for his support.
-
OJ 10/3, [8] Handwritten postcard from Otto Erich Deutsch Deutsch to Schenker, dated February 12,
1920
The Beethoven House will only allow reproduction of the manuscript of the
"Moonlight" Sonata in return for a royalty. Deutsch has offered 5% of the retail
price.
-
OJ 10/3, [9] Handwritten postcard from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated March 1,
1920
Deutsch thanks Schenker for his suggestion of Brahms's Op. 117; Mr. Kalbeck
has suggested Brahms's "Sapphische Ode" (Op. 95, No. 4) and "Nachtwandler" (Op. 86, No.
3).
-
OC 52/223 Handwritten draft contract, in Jeanette Schenker's hand, between UE and Schenker for
the Kleine Bibliothek and Beethoven sonatas edition, undated [March 17,?] 1920
Handwritten draft contract jointly for the Kleine Bibliothek and Beethoven
sonatas edition.
-
OC 52/447 Draft Contract between UE and Schenker for the Beethoven Sonatas edition, dated March
23, 1920
Draft contract for the Beethoven Sonatas edition.
-
OC 52/221 Typed letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated March 26, 1920
Hertzka seeks a meeting to discuss the letter of agreement about the Beethoven
sonatas edition, and laments their difficulty in meeting.
-
OJ 10/3, [10] Handwritten postcard from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated June 15,
1920
The Beethoven House has given permission for the reproduction of the
"Moonlight" Sonata, and have suggested a photographer. Before arranging for the
reproduction, Deutsch asks Schenker to send his existing prints to determine if they are
suitable.
-
OJ 10/3, [11] Printed birth announcement from Deutsch Family [to Schenker], dated July 11,
1920
Otto Erich and Hanna Deutsch announce the birth of their son, Franz Peter, on
July 11, 1920.
-
OJ 15/16, [42] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated July 11, 1920
Weisse wishes Schenker an enjoyable summer holiday, and looks forward to visiting
him. He inquires about the possibility of moving into Reisnerstraße 38, in the event that the
Schenkers move elsewhere, and informs his teacher about the organization of a lecture series at
the Vienna Urania. He concludes with some remarks about literary works, Wedekind's Schloß
Wetterstein and Jean Paul's Levana.
-
OJ 10/3, [12] Typewritten postcard from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated July 12,
1920
Deutsch has written to Edward Speyer about the sketchleaf [of the "Moonlight"
Sonata], and wishes Schenker success with his contract for the Little Library and Complete
Edition.
-
OJ 8/3, [87] Handwritten picture postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 14,
1920
The Schenkers like Seefeld and are busy with proofs, etc. — Will Violin visit
them?
-
OJ 15/16, [43] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated July 19, 1920
Weisse reports his arrival for the summer in Ischl, and the grave illness that
has befallen his grandfather there. He sends Schenker three excerpts from Jean Paul's review of
Mme. de Staël's "On Germany" (1810), which he expects his teacher will find useful as cultural
and political ammunition against the French.
-
OJ 10/3, [13] Typewritten postcard from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated August 5,
1920
The photograph of Speyer's sketchleaves is still forthcoming. Deutsch has
discovered that a Dr. Wilhelm Kux possesses a further sketchleaf of the "Moonlight" Sonata,
and asks Schenker if he wants Deutsch to try secure a reproduction of it.
-
OJ 15/16, [44] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 10, 1920
Weisse explains that his grandfather's death prevents him from visiting Schenker
in Seefeld, but hopes that he might nonetheless visit him elsewhere before the end of the summer
holidays.
-
OJ 10/3, [14] Typewritten letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated August 16,
1920
Deutsch has written to Wilhelm Kux [about his sketchleaf of the "Moonlight"
Sonata], and has received a letter from Edward Speyer, in which Speyer explains that he
cannot make a copy of his sketchleaf of the "Moonlight" Sonata while in the countryside.
Speyer also writes that a further sketchleaf of the "Moonlight" Sonata is held in the
Fitzwilliam Museum and has supplied a facsimile. Deutsch asks Schenker if he would like him
to write to the Museum to request a photograph of the sketchleaf.
-
OJ 8/3, [89] Handwritten postcard from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 23, 1920
Gives date of return to Vienna, and confirms Tuesday meeting.
-
OJ 10/3, [15] Typewritten letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated September 13,
1920
Deutsch asks Schenker to clarify whether bars are missing from the start of
the "Moonlight" Sonata manuscript, as well as from the end. Deutsch outlines Universal
Edition's intended format for the volume, and ask if Schenker approves of their proposals.
Deutsch has written again to Wilhelm Kux requesting a copy of the sketchleaf, and reminds
Schenker to examine the sketchleaf of the Sonata that was reproduced in the Musical
Times.
-
OJ 10/3, [16] Typewritten letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated October 1,
1920
Deutsch encloses images of Wilhelm Kux's sketchleaf of the "Moonlight" Sonata
for Schenker to study. He is writing to the [Fitzwilliam] Museum in Cambridge about their
sketchleaf of the Sonata.
-
OJ 10/3, [17] Typewritten letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated November 6,
1920
Deutsch encloses two photographic prints of the Fitzwilliam Museum's
"Moonlight" Sonata sketchleaf. Edward Speyer has not yet had his sketchleaf photographed,
but has sent a description of its content, which Deutsch passes on.
-
OJ 10/3, [18] Typewritten postcard from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated November 13,
1920
Deutsch has obtained a sheet with corrections for Beethoven's "Hammerklavier"
Sonata, which he would like to show Schenker. The photographic images of the "Moonlight"
Sonata will be made this week.
-
OJ 10/3, [19] Typewritten postcard from Leo Fischmann to Schenker, dated November 22,
1920
Leo Fischmann (legal attorney) invites Schenker to visit him at
home.
-
OJ 10/3, [20] Typewritten letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated November 26,
1920
Replying to Schenker's postcard of November 20th, Deutsch writes that the
connoisseur edition is to be reproduced using photolithography, and repeats the particulars
of the Fitzwilliam Museum's "Moonlight" Sonata sketchleaves. Speyer has allowed his
sketchleaf of the Sonata to be photographed, and reports that he also owns a letter from
Beethoven to Schlesinger (Paris) about corrections to the C minor Sonata (Op. 111).
Universal Edition urgently requires a prospectus for the Beethoven day, and so Deutsch asks
for sight of the draft of Schenker's Preface.
-
OJ 10/3, [21] Typewritten letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated December 11,
1920
Deutsch encloses the photographs of Edward Speyer's "Moonlight" Sonata
sketchleaves and asks Schenker to revise his Preface accordingly, before forwarding the
photographs and Preface to him. The photographic reproduction of the Sonata manuscript in
Bonn has been delayed by a chemical and glass shortage. Schenker's corrections were used for
the prospectus.
-
OJ 10/3, [22] Typewritten letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated December 23,
1920
Deutsch confirms receipt of Schenker preface for the "Moonlight" Sonata
edition and five photographs of sketchleaves. He will send a formal contract in the next few
days.
-
OJ 14/21, [1] Delivery note from Seidel'sche Buchhandlung to Schenker, dated January 26, 1921
Delivery note from Deutsch's book dealership (Seidel'sche Buchhandlung) for Frimmel,
Beethoven-Forschung Vol. 1/8.
-
OJ 10/3, [23] Handwritten letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated January 30,
1921
The overdue ["Moonlight" Sonata edition] contract is finally ready, and
Deutsch hopes that Schenker is happy with the wording. The Bonn photographs are also ready.
Schenker should expect to receive an edited version of his commentary, and perhaps also an
English translation.
-
OJ 14/21, [2] Carbon copy of delivery note from Seidel'sche Buchhandlung to Schenker, dated 26 January, 1921, with
additional annotations, dated February 9, 1921
Annotated carbon copy of a delivery note from Deutsch's book dealership (Seidel'sche Buchhandlung)
for Frimmel, Beethoven-Forschung Vol. 1/8.
-
OC 24/22 Typewritten postcard from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated June 28,
1921
Deutsch thanks Schenker for his postcard of June 26, 1921, and wishes him good
luck in his new home and with his summer trip to Galtür. Deutsch has read issue 1 of
Tonwille with great interest, and hopes that their connoisseur edition will be as
successful.
-
OJ 15/15, [9] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, postmarked August 22, 1921
Weisse is taking a very late summer holiday and so cannot visit Schenker in
Galtür. He has finished composing a sonata and is writing out a fair copy.
-
OJ 14/45, [11] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated September 1, 1921
Violin announces the formation of a piano trio ensemble with a violinist named
Wolfsthal and the cellist Friedrich Buxbaum, inquires about the proposed edition of Handel's
keyboard works, and reports on the incipient civil unrest in the wake of a national movement in
Germany.
-
OJ 15/15, [10] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated September 12, 1921
Nearing the end of a two-week holiday in Bad Ischl, Weisse hopes to see Schenker
in Vienna the following Sunday.
-
OJ 10/3, [24] Typewritten letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated September 24,
1921
Deutsch reports that the "Moonlight" Sonata edition is almost finished, but
because of translation problems he has asked Dr. Kalmus to show Schenker the latest revision
of the English preface. Schenker's photographic reproductions will be returned once a sample
print-out of the edition has been prepared and approved. The edition will launch in the
autumn, and Schenker's fee will have increased because of the delay.
-
OJ 14/45, [12] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated October 30, 1921
Violin reports on his work, and on musicians in Hamburg, and congratulates
Schenker on his (publication) successes.
-
OJ 10/3, [25] Typewritten letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated November 15,
1921
Deutsch notes the advance payments for Vrieslander's and Hoboken's copies of
the luxury edition of the "Moonlight" Sonata, both of which are to be delivered to
Vrieslander.
-
OJ 10/3, [26] Typewritten postcard from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated December 28,
1921
A payment of 1,200 marks from Seidel's Book Dealership, on behalf of Deutsch,
has been made to Schenker's Deutsche Bank account.
-
OJ 10/3, [27] Typewritten postcard from Österreichisches Credit-Institut to Schenker, dated
December 30, 1921
The Österreichisches Credit-Institut informs Schenker that 1,200 marks has
been paid into his account from Seidel's Book Dealership, O. E. Deutsch & Co,
Vienna.
-
OJ 6/7, [2] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated January 29, 1922
Schenker offers to lend Violin his performing materials for two keyboard
concertos by C. P. E. Bach. He inquires about musical life in Hamburg, reports on his most
recent work, continues to despair of his financial situation.
-
OJ 14/45, [13] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated February 2, 1922
In this direct reply to Schenker's previous letter, OJ 6/7, [2], Violin expresses
his dismay that some of the performing material for keyboard concertos by C. P. E. Bach,
including original cadenzas by Schenker, appear to have gone missing. — He reports on his
growing number of pupils, on the acquisition of a piano for his apartment, and on Hamburg's
extremely conservative musical tastes.
-
OJ 10/3, [28] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated February 14, 1922
Deutsch offers to provide several books to Schenker instead of two or three hardback copies of the
"Moonlight" Sonata edition, and then details several misprints and factual errors in Romain Rolland's biography
of Beethoven.
-
OJ 14/21, [3] Delivery note from Seidel'sche Buchhandlung to Schenker, dated February 15, 1922
Delivery note from Deutsch's bookshop (Seidel'sche Buchhandlung) to Schenker for works by J. S.
Bach, Mozart and Brahms.
-
OC 12/1 Handwritten letter from Theodor Frimmel to Deutsch, dated February 22, 1922 (forwarded from Deutsch to
Schenker with marginal note dated Feburary 27, 1922)
Deutsch forwards Schenker a letter from Theodor Frimmel regarding errors in Rolland's Beethoven
biography. In the original letter, Frimmel asks Deutsch to send his regards to the Schenkers.
-
OJ 10/1, [69] Typed letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated March 11, 1922
Dahms's book, which has earned an award, is delayed at the bindery. He blames
this on the prevailing undisciplined conditions in Germany, criticizes the current government,
and predicts war.
-
OJ 11/36, [5] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker dated March 23, 1922
Hammer praises Schenker's edition of Bach's Chromatic Fantasy & Fugue,
raising an issue about fingering on the clavichord.— He inquires after Tonwille 2, and hopes to
visit Schenker in Vienna soon.
-
OJ 10/3, [30] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated April 8, 1922
Deutsch has learnt from Dr. [Greta] Kraus that Dr. Haas still does not want to allow them to
reproduce facsimiles of Beethoven's "Spring" Sonata Op. 24, because he feels bound to Drei Masken. When
Universal Edition have confirmed this to Deutsch, Deutsch will ask Schenker to propose a different Beethoven
manuscript.
-
OJ 10/3, [31] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated April 18, 1922
Deutsch informs Schenker that Drei Masken is publishing a facsimile of Beethoven's Piano Sonata in
C minor, Op. 111.
-
OJ 10/3, [32] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated April 20, 1922
Deutsch thanks Schenker for his suggestions [for further facsimile editions] and has passed them
on to Universal Edition.
-
OJ 10/3, [33] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated April 21, 1922
Deutsch has already written to Universal Edition about [Schenker's proposal for a facsimile
edition of] Beethoven's Piano Sonata Op. 109. Should this plan be realized, he hopes that Schenker will provide
a foreword.
-
OJ 10/3, [34] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated April 26, 1922
Deutsch reports that Universal Edition has agreed to publish facsimile editions of Beethoven's
Piano Sonatas Opp. 109 and 110; he asks what sources Schenker could make available. Deutsch would also like to
know which Beethoven string quartet Schenker would recommend for a further facsimile edition.
-
OJ 10/3, [35] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated May 12, 1922
Deutsch has passed Schenker's suggestions for facsimile editions on to Universal Edition, and asks
for a reference for the Bekker article that Schenker mentioned.
-
OJ 10/3, [36] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated May 22, 1922
Deutsch asks Schenker to visit him in his office in the next few days.
-
JOB 94-3, [2] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer dated May 25, 1922
Schenker sends a sketch of Mendelssohn's "Altdeutsches Lied"; — justifies an
instance of his fingering questioned by Hammer; — complains about Hertzka; — promises to
read Fiedler and Hildebrand.
-
OJ 10/3, [37] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated May 26, 1922
Deutsch reports that Drei Masken will not publish a facsimile edition of Beethoven's "Spring"
Sonata Op. 24, and will instead publish editions of Beethoven's Piano Sonata in F-sharp Op. 78, a string quartet
by Haydn, and Schubert's Winterreise and B minor Symphony.
-
OJ 14/21, [4] Invoice from Seidel'sche Buchhandlung to Schenker, dated June 30, 1922
Invoice from Deutsch's bookshop (Seidel'sche Buchhandlung) for works by Mozart and Brahms, and a
book by Hildebrand, which also shows a credit remittance for one copy of Schenker's facsimile edition of
Beethoven's "Moonlight" Sonata.
-
OJ 15/16, [46] Handwritten letter from Hans and Hertha Weisse to Schenker, dated July 21, 1922
Weisse reports from Vienna that a sum of money has arrived, and will be paid to
its intended recipient (Kohn), and gives an account of his and Hertha Weisse's travels in
Vorarlberg following a visit to the Schenkers in Galtür.
-
OJ 8/4, [13] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 9, 1922
Schenker reports the publication of the second part of Kontrapunkt and continued
difficulties with Universal Edition.
-
OJ 11/35, 20 Handwritten letter from Halm to Schenker, dated July 24 and August 19, 1922
Halm announces publication of his three suites for piano trio, and has arranged for two of
them to be sent to Schenker. He thanks Schenker for sending him Kontrapunkt II, and expresses admiration
for the "power of the broad conception" of Schenker's work. He is distressed at Schenker's attacks on
other countries and glorification of Germany, and speaks with appreciation of French and Russian music. He
describes his new publisher.
-
OJ 14/45, [14] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated July 24, 1922
In this highly emotional letter, Violin describes his personal difficulties in
the face of spiraling inflation in Germany.
-
OJ 8/4, [14] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 5, 1922
Schenker commends Walter Dahm's latest book, Die Offenbarung der Musik, to Violin
as one which ought to have important consequences for the course of music.
-
OJ 14/45, [16] Handwritten lettercard from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated September 13, 1922
Violin reports briefly about his son's health, then goes into the practical
issues arising from Schenker's active search for a post at a German music institute.
-
DLA 69.930/10 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Halm, dated September 25, 1922
Acknowledges OJ 11/35, 20 and composition; expects to be able to comment on
Halm's Klavierübung in Tonwille 4; reports Leipzig University's decision not to appoint him;
speculates on the impact of Kontrapunkt 2 and Der freie Satz; public difficulty in accepting
Urgesetze. — Aristide Briand: The importance of being well-read on a topic before commenting in
public: Schoenberg and Reger; newspapers. — Maximilian Harden: although faithful to Schenker,
Harden had not mastered the topics on which he wrote. — National Govenment: Schenker's
publishing plans, including "The Future of Humanity": man's anthropomorphic thinking is a
delusion, he needs to adapt to nature, to return to a primitive state, to abandon "development"
and "progress" and return to primordial laws; inferior man wants to "govern" (bowel wants to
become brain); Schenker deplores "artifice" (French) as against nature (German). — Things
French: praises German superiority over French in its joy of work. — Higher Plane: the German
should not abase himself before the Frenchman.
-
OJ 10/1, [72] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated October 28, 1922
Dahms chooses to remain in Italy in view of the "moral and physical devastation"
that he hears reported from Germany. — He is committed to Schust & Loeffler for a Haydn
biography. He reports on a review of his book "Offenbarung."
-
OJ 10/3, [38] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated October 30, 1922
Deutsch apologizes for the delay to Schenker's payment for the "Moonlight"
Sonata facsimile edition, for which Deutsch himself is to blame. Schenker's debt to Seidel's
Book Dealership is 301 marks and 300 kronen, which should be balanced by his income from the
facsimile edition.
-
OJ 12/59, [1] Handwritten letter from Siegfried Fritz Müller to Schenker, October 31,
1922
Siegfried Fritz Müller suspends his lessons with Schenker on account of his
father's financial circumstances.
-
OJ 10/3, [39] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated December 29, 1922
Deutsch provides a full overview of Schenker income from the current sales reported by Universal
Edition of the "Moonlight" Sonata facsimile edition, and also his debts at Seidel's Book Dealership; Schenker
owes Deutsch 76.65 marks. Deutsch is dissatisfied with Universal Edition's behavior with respect to the
publication.
-
OJ 11/2, [2] Handwritten letter from Emma Fischer to Schenker, dated February 23, 1923
Baroness Fischer gives names and addresses of five of her pupils to whom Der
Tonwille should be sent; she regrets that Schenker will not spread his theory further by
means of lectures.
-
OJ 10/1, [75] Handwritten postcard from Dahms to Schenker, dated May 7, 1923
Dahms has received Vrieslander's essay on Schenker; reports progress on
subscriptions for his de luxe edition, proofs, and his work on Haydn; political comment.
-
OJ 6/7, [5] Handwritten letter from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 9,
1923
Having settled into country life in the Tyrol, Schenker returns to his work, in
particular to the ongoing battles with Hertzka over the publication of Der Tonwille. He asks
Violin’s opinion about a subscription plan for a periodical that would appear four times a year
(instead of the current two), and hopes that his friend might spare a few days to visit him in
Galtür.
-
OJ 14/45, [24] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated July 14, 1923
Violin has met an industrialist by the name of Max Temming who would be willing
to help make Schenker’s work more widely accessible. Violin will probably not visit the
Schenkers in Galtür this summer, as prices have gone up in Germany.
-
OJ 14/45, [25] Handwritten lettercard from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated August 16, 1923
Violin cannot come to the Tyrol to visit the Schenkers, on account of the
turmoil in Germany and horrendous currency situation; he will come to Vienna for Christmas, but
only for a few days.
-
OC 12/7-9 Handwritten letter from Halm to Schenker dated November 6‒10, 1923
Halm has sent the published score of a string quartet to Schenker. —Patronage has
enabled him to publish three volumes of compositions; reports on current and past composition
activities and publications. —Discusses what he has learned from Schenker's theories, and
questions whether it would be a fault were Bruckner's symphonies not to contain the Urlinie;
Halm's book on Bruckner's symphonies has gone into its second edition. —Halm suspects that
Schenker may not "agree with" his compositions, and asks whether Schenker wishes to receives
further scores. —Halm considers socialism a "historical necessity."
-
OJ 6/7, [7] Handwritten letter from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 21,
1923
In a wide-ranging letter, Schenker expresses his joy at Karl Violin’s improving
health, and goes on to mention a number of personal successes he has lately had, including a
visit from Paul von Klenau to take advice for a forthcoming performance of Beethoven’s Missa
solemnis. He has also had some unexpected support from his publisher, who wants to expand Der
Tonwille to a quarterly publication. He is planning to take part in a series of charity concerts
(three Haydn piano trios), and has heard that Clemens Kraus and Hans Knappertsbusch are
overtaking Furtwängler as conductors in Vienna by accepting more modest fees.
-
OJ 10/1, [81] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated November 20, 1923
Dahms has now received acknowledgement from Moriz Schenker. — He asks
Schenker's help in approaching financier Castiglioni for financial backing for his planned
bel canto book.
-
OJ 14/45, [27] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated December 11, 1923
Violin reports the conversion to a new, stable currency in Germany; Hamburg has
been among the first cities to benefit from this, as a result of which he is somewhat better off
and the prospects for the future appear brighter. He plans to come to Vienna for Christmas, if
only for a few days; this will give him an opportunity to discuss arrangements for the
distribution of copies of Der Tonwille to libraries and schools.
-
OJ 14/21, [6] Interim invoice from Seidel'sche Buchhandlung to Schenker, dated February 2, 1924
Delivery note from Seidel'sche Buchhandlung to Schenker for Beethoven's Piano Sonata in F-sharp,
Op. 78.
-
OJ 14/45, [30] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated February 5, 1924
Violin reports that Max Temming is keen to support his plan to promote Schenker's
work. Following discussions with Schenker in Vienna, he makes some provisional calculations on
how the gift of money would give Schenker more time to devote to his writings. He also thinks
about the happy prospect of Schenker coming to Hamburg.
-
OJ 10/3, [40] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated May 9, 1924
Deutsch thanks Schenker for the most recent (sixth) issue of Tonwille. He read Schenker's comments
on Schubert's "Gretchen am Spinnrade" (Op. 2) with great interest, although he did not fully understand them.
Deutsch encloses an announcement from the publisher Vieweg that may be of interest to Schenker.
-
UMdK Z 312 D/1924, [1] Typewritten letter from the Verein zur Speisung to the Akademie für Musik, dated May
21, 1924
The letter quotes the will of Mrs Sofie Deutsch, then announces that the
Verein is in process of dissolution, and decrees that the capital in question be devolved
upon the Akademie für Musik und darstellende Kunst, and refers the Akademie to its
attorney.
-
OJ 10/1, [85] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated June 18, 1924
The Dahmses send birthday greetings. They are staying in the Abruzzi; will not
get to Galtür; Dahms will visit Germany. He has read Tonwille 6 and 7 with interest.
-
OJ 15/15, [16] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 4, 1924
Weisse has sent Schenker a volume of Kalbeck's Brahms biography, and reports that
Universal Edition is about to send him the proofs for two of his compositions, a set of vocal
quartets and a string quartet.
-
OJ 15/16, [52] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 28, 1924
Weisse is so absorbed in his work that he is unable to give Schenker a precise
number of subscribers to Der Tonwille among his circle of pupils. He will see Gerald Warburg
soon, but confesses that the latter felt hurt by Schenker’s article “The Mission of German
Genius.” — Weisse will devote much time to composition during the coming season, and for this
reason will forego taking further lessons from Schenker.
-
OJ 14/45, [33] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated August 29, 1924
Violin reports on continued negotiations with Max Temming on the distribution of
free copies of Der Tonwille, and gives a brief description of the Hamburger Fremdenblatt (in
which something about Schenker's writings may have recently appeared). He expresses his
embarrassment regarding the essay he had written at the behest of Otto Vrieslander on the
occasion of Schenker's 50th birthday, but agrees to let him see it.
-
DLA 69.930/13 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Halm, dated October 6, 1924
Asks Halm to send some of his chamber music to Rudolf Pollak, with prospect of
performance of the A major string quartet. —Deplores current situation over Sofie Deutsch
stipends. —Reports difficulties with UE and intention to change publisher.
-
OJ 14/45, [36] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated October 22, 1924
In the process of arranging for copies of Der Tonwille to be distributed, Violin
discovers that a pupil of his paid twice as much for one issue as the marked price in Austria.
He has made some inquiries into this matter, and asks Schenker what an issue currently costs in
Austria. There are no respectable music institutions in Hamburg, so Violin will distribute
copies there personally.
-
OJ 10/1, [86] Handwritten postcard from Dahms to Schenker, dated November 8, 1924
Dahms visited Germany for two weeks; invites the Schenkers to visit him in
Venice.
-
OJ 9/34, [1] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated January 21, 1925
Cube has had to extend his holiday to take care of his father, who has been forced to abandon his
second marriage under pressure from his firm.
-
UMdK Z 163 D/1925, [1] Typewritten letter from Kallina (Bundesministerium) to the Akademie für Musik, dated
February 23, 1925
The Akademie is instructed to draw up an endowment letter concerning the
Sophie Deutsch stipends, and to avoid inclusion of slates of candidates; Schenker must
determine how adjudication should be conducted after his death.
-
OJ 14/45, [109] Handwritten postcard from Moriz Violin to Schenker, undated, postmarked February 24,
1925
Visiting his dying brother Eduard in the Sophienspital in Vienna, Violin hopes
to see Schenker if at all possible.
-
OJ 6/7, [21] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated May 16, 1925
Making preparations with his solicitor for the legal action against Universal
Edition, Schenker asks Violin to find out whether Max Temming paid for the additional
subscriptions to Der Tonwille directly through Albert Gutmann in Vienna, or through the firm of
Hofmeister in Leipzig. He is nearing completion of the contents of the first Meisterwerk
yearbook and asks Violin whether he has yet made summer plans and whether these might include a
trip to Galtür.
-
OJ 11/54, [2] Handwritten letter from Hoboken to Schenker, May 29, 1925
Hoboken wishes to become a pupil of Schenker; he has studied Schenker's
theoretical works under Vrieslander, and describes his progress so far; outlines previous
education in piano and music theory at the Hoch Conservatory,Frankfurt, and activity as composer
and conductor; after breaking his shoulder, he neglected his musical studies; outlines the areas
he wishes to study with Schenker; if accepted, he would take up residence in
Vienna.
-
OJ 11/54, [3] Handwritten letter from Hoboken to Schenker, dated June 10, 1925
Acknowledges Schenker's communication; is pleased to become a pupil of Schenker;
accepts fee and agrees to three lessons per week.
-
OJ 6/7, [24] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated August 15, 1925
After expressing his sympathy for Violin, in response to his friend's depressing
postcard, Schenker gives an account of some of the summer events, including a visit from
Vrieslander and Hoboken and work on two essays for Meisterwerk 2. While continuing to rail
against Hertzka and Universal Edition, he repeats the story of Drei Masken Verlag failing to
send him 250 Marks upon receipt of the manuscript of Meisterwerk 1. His brother Moses is,
however, acquainted with the principal owner of Drei Masken, Felix Sobotka, and through this
connection the payment has been made.
-
OJ 8/4, [39] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, undated, postmarked
August 27, 1925
Schenker sends greetings from the Tyrol, reports the publication of an article
on him by Elsa Bienenfeld, which includes a reproduction of his pupil Alfred Rothberger's
bronze medallion.
-
OJ 14/45, [45] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated August 28, 1925
Violin, in a philosophical mood, thanks Schenker for his concerns; he paints a
pessimistic picture of the world in general, embracing the injustices that his friend must
also suffer.
-
OJ 11/54, [4] Handwritten letter from Hoboken to Schenker, dated September 28, 1925
Van Hoboken reports on his recent travels, describing the house that he has
rented for a year in Vienna; he is to register in Vienna for nine months for study purposes; he
thanks Schenker for the plan of work he has sent, and will start lessons with Schenker on
October 13, 1925; encloses $60 in advance monthly payment.
-
OJ 15/15, [19] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated October 7, 1925
Weisse asks Schenker to look at some suitable frames for Hammer's portrait of
him. He reports that several autograph manuscripts of Brahms are being put up for sale, of
which that of the cadenzas Brahms wrote for Beethoven's Fourth Concerto are particularly
interesting. He quotes from a letter by Gerald Warburg, indicating that Schenker's latest
theoretical concepts are being taught at Damrosch's music school in New
York.
-
FS 40/27, [2] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated October 17, 1925
Weisse has found Zelter's review of Haydn's Creation and has copied out the
section concerned with "The Representation of Chaos." He finds nothing of value in the
review, but says it must have pleased Haydn because it shows that the composer was entirely
conscious of how he went about writing the work.
-
OJ 10/3, [41] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated October 20, 1925
Deutsch thanks Schenker for quickly providing his text [for the forthcoming Schubert issue of
Moderne Welt]. He has written to Thomas Mann regarding the reference to Schubert's "Der Lindenbaum" in Mann's
novel Der Zauberberg. The Deutsches accept Schenker's invitation for an afternoon snack, but can only come on a
Sunday after Novemeber 2.
-
OJ 9/4, [1] Typewritten letter from Franz Schmidt (Akademie für Musik) to Schenker, dated October
21, 1925
Schmidt reports the response from the Federal Ministry of
Education.
-
OC 54/41 Typewritten letter from August Demblin (DMV) to Schenker, dated November 6,
1925
Drei Masken Verlag in Munich have now transferred all matters of production
concerning Meisterwerk I to their office in Vienna.
-
OJ 10/3, [42] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated November 6, 1925
Deutsch informs Schenker that due to space constraints the editors have (without Deutsch's prior
knowledge) cut the first four paragraphs of Schenker's article, leaving only the last two paragraphs, which
refer particularly to Schubert. He asks Schenker to agree to this cut, but also offers him the option of
removing his article so that it can be used in full elsewhere. Deutsch asks Schenker to look at a Beethoven
manuscript at Heck's.
-
OJ 10/3, [43] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated November 7, 1925
Deutsch thanks Schenker for agreeing to the cuts to his article, and asks to come to the Schenkers
on November 22 for the planned snack.
-
OJ 10/3, [44] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated November 22, 1925
Deutsch enjoyed today's afternoon tea at the Schenkers and will return the Vrieslander and Hammer
books to Schenker tomorrow. He asks Schenker to speak to Hoboken about the possibility of him purchasing
Deutsch's collection of Schubert first editions.
-
OJ 10/3, [45] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated December 9, 1925
Deutsch sends Schenker a dedication copy of the Schubert special issue of Moderne Welt, to which
Schenker contributed an article. Deutsch had already requested a copy to be sent to Schenker from the publisher,
but this has gone missing.
-
OJ 10/3, [46] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated December 15, 1925
Deutsch thanks Schenker for his postcard [not known to survive] and hopes to speak to him soon
about the matters raised therein. Deutsch, however, could neither read nor understand a sentence from Schenker's
postcard and affixes it to this reply.
-
OJ 11/54, [6] Handwritten letter from van Hoboken to Schenker, dated January 3, 1926
Van Hoboken sends New Year greetings; reports that he is to see in the Paris
Conservatory Library the autograph manuscript of Beethoven's "Appassionata" Sonata, which
Einstein has apparently already photographed; he will travel to Vienna on January 6 for lesson
on January 9.
-
OJ 14/45, [50] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated January 12, 1926
Violin asks Schenker if he would consider taking one of his pupils, Miss Agnes
Becker, as a pupil for the remainder of the teaching year.
-
OJ 9/3, [4] Typewritten letter from Guido Adler to Schenker, dated February 10, 1926
Invitation to join the Conference Committee of the Beethoven Centennial
Celebration 1927.
-
OJ 10/3, [47] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated February 15, 1926
Deutsch has received Schenker's request for a subscription to Die literarische Welt and has
dispatched the required payment transfer form.
-
OJ 14/45, [51] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated February 18, 1926
Violin, in the aftermath of two enormously successful trio concerts with
Mauritz van den Berg and Friedrich Buxbaum, gives an account of Buxbaum's vanity and the
difficulty this causes in rehearsals and more generally for the ensemble. His doctor has
recommended that he spends three weeks in Bad Gastein this summer. He has not yet received
Hammer's portrait of Schenker.
-
OJ 14/45, [52] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated March 6, 1926
Responding to Schenker's continuing queries, Violin gives some details of
recent illnesses, the cure for which his doctor has ordered him to spend part of the summer
in Bad Gastein. He is awaiting the arrival of the Hammer portrait, and is considering the
future of his piano trio ensemble.
-
OJ 10/1, [92] Typewritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated May 21, 1926
Dahms reports plans, with a young Munich publisher, to launch a popular music
"almanach," anti-modern, propagandizing for "our ideas," and later a serious periodical. —
He has to raise 10,000 Marks, and asks for Heinrich's help in doing this. — Margarete has
had surgery.
-
OJ 14/45, [53] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated June 7, 1926
Violin thanks Schenker for his recent postcard, gives a brief account of his
own illnesses, and gives a somewhat longer account of those of his son Karl, which will
complicate summer travel plans. He has learned from music shops in Hamburg that the
Erläuterungsausgabe of Op. 106 is not yet published, and has also heard that Schenker's
Beethoven sonata edition is no longer available; he asks Schenker if this is
true.
-
OC 54/90 Typed letter from Alfred Böhme (DMV) to Schenker, dated June 23, 1926
In response to Schenker’s query regarding advance payments for Das Meisterwerk
in der Musik, the Vienna office of Drei Masken Verlag explain that they have instructions
only to offer the remainder of the advance on the first Yearbook, and that no decision has
yet been made with regard to the second.
-
OJ 10/1, [95] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, undated, presumably late June or early
July, 1926
Dahms's almanach plans have failed. — Germany has shown its gratitude for his
work by denying him a divorce [from Agnes] for 15 years.
-
OJ 14/45, [112] Handwritten postcard from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated July 5, 1926
Violin announces his arrival in Bad Gastein, to improve his health. The rest
of his family is in Bistrai, near Bielitz, in Silesia.
-
OJ 52/897 Receipt for bank transaction from the Post Office Savings Bank to Schenker, dated July
16, 1926
Receipt for sum of 232.14 shillings [from UE].
-
OJ 15/16, [56] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 20, 1926
The composition of a clarinet quintet has kept Weisse from writing to Schenker.
Instead of writing a long letter to him about the first Meisterwerk Yearbook, he would like to
meet with him in Vienna to discuss its content.
-
OJ 11/54, [8] Handwritten letter from Hoboken to Schenker, dated August 22, 1926
Hoboken will probably not now visit Schenker in Galtür; explains his and his
wife's departure from Munich and their subsequent travels to Bern, Naples, and Capri, and
reports that his house in Vienna should be ready for occupancy on October 1. — Vrieslander and
he are considering founding a music journal, and wish to discuss the idea with Schenker.
-
OJ 9/35, [2] Handwritten letter from Gustav von Cube to Schenker, dated August 24, 1926
Responding to Schenker’s demand for final payment for his son’s lessons, Gustav
von Cube has arranged for 250 Marks to be paid to Schenker in Galtür; he will send the remainder
to Vienna.
-
OJ 5/7a, [3] (formerly vC 3) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated August 26, 1926
Schenker has received indication of part-payment from Cube's father [for Cube's
lessons] and promise of the remainder soon. Schenker travels to Vienna August 28. Weisse has
completed a clarinet quintet.
-
OJ 14/45, [55] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated September 5, 1926
Violin reports that he had to cut short his holiday in Bad Gastein because his
son Karl was again seriously ill. The costs of treatment amounted to nearly 4000 Marks, and
this sum must be paid by the end of the year.
-
OJ 5/17, [1, vsn 1] Handwritten draft letter from Schenker to Hindemith, undated [November 3, 1926]
In response to Hindemith's letter of October 25, 1926, Schenker's 15-page first
draft states his preference for a meeting with Hindemith in Vienna. Schenker thinks differently
from Hindemith: the notion of a "good musician" is a delusion; artistic property is comparable
with material property; the music of today is quite different from that of the past, the rules
of the masterworks do not govern it, hence it is not art at all. Schenker reserves the right to
speak his own mind.
-
OJ 9/34, [3] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated November 25, 1926
Cube asks for a letter of recommendation to be sent to the Provincial School
Council.
-
OC 52/908 Typed letter from Hugo Winter (UE) to Schenker, dated December 28, 1926
Payments for Beethoven sonatas and Der Tonwille have been transferred.
-
OJ 14/45, [60] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated January 3, 1927
Violin reports on his son Karl's continued health problems and also his
affection for his "Onkel Heinrich" (and with it, a wish to be in Vienna rather than in
Hamburg). Agnes Becker has apparently sent Schenker some analytical work on a sonata for
comment. Finally, he announces a forthcoming concert, with (Egon) Pollak, of a concerto for
two pianos by C. P. E. Bach in an arrangement by Schenker.
-
OC 52/909 Typed letter from Hugo Winter (UE) to Schenker, dated January 4, 1927
Encloses Schenker's royalty statement for the second half of 1926.
-
OC 54/111 Typed letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated January 8, 1927
Deutsch thanks Schenker for his recent communications, including a copy of the
contract with Drei Masken Verlag for the Meisterwerk Yearbook, and asks for a copy of
relevant extracts from the correspondence with the publishers. He reports progress in the
establishment of a Photogram Archive at the Austrian National Library, with the cooperation
of Dr Robert Haas and financial support from Anthony van Hoboken; similar plans to
photographically reproduce autograph manuscripts are underway at the Beethoven House in
Bonn, and (for manuscripts of Bach and Handel) also in England. He advises Schenker that
proofs will start arriving from the printing-house Waldheim in a few weeks, and expresses
his delight in being able to assist Schenker in the promotion of his work.
-
OJ 10/3, [52] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated January 15, 1927
Deutsch asks Schenker if a (recent) edition of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony was
based on the facsimile edition. He has sent the manuscript (of Schenker’s second Meisterwerk
yearbook) to the publishers. A Haydn facsimile and a Handel print can be discussed
later.
-
OJ 10/3, [53] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated January 16, 1927
Deutsch asks Schenker what he wrote about Domenico Scarlatti and Chopin as
non-German geniuses, for his forthcoming trip to Sweden. He has learned that Schubert was
paid for two summers’ teaching for the Esterházy family; he has valued two song manuscripts
belonging to the family at 4,000 marks.
-
OJ 11/54, [10] Handwritten letter from van Hoboken to Schenker, dated January 16, 1927
Van Hoboken acknowledges [non-extant] missive; has been unable to look up Gerald
Warburg; asks for John Petrie Dunn's address; has seen Otto Vrieslander.
-
OJ 10/3, [54] Typewritten postcard from Otto Erich and Hanna Deutsch to Schenker, dated January
18, 1927
Vrieslander would like to give a lecture on Schenker and Beethoven at the
centenary celebrations in Vienna; Deutsch asks Schenker to contact Vrieslander directly
about this.
-
OJ 10/3, [55] Typewritten postcard from Otto Erich and Hanna Deutsch to Schenker, dated January
18, 1927
Deutsch asks Schenker not to mention his name in connection with the
“curiosity” about Schubert mentioned in his postcard of January 15.
-
OJ 11/54, [12] Handwritten letter from van Hoboken to Schenker, dated January 28, 1927
Hoboken had to cancel his planned visit to John Petrie Dunn because of illness. —
He reports on library visits in London and Paris, discusses manuscripts and conditions for
photography, purchases. — He plans no further trips this season.
-
OJ 9/4, [3] Typewritten letter from Joseph Marx and Alexander Wunderer (Akademie für Musik) to
Schenker, dated February 3, 1927
Schenker is asked to give the Federal Ministry of Education his opinion as to
how the Sofie Deutsch stipends should be adjudicated after his death.
-
OC 54/132 Typed letter from Otto Vrieslander to Schenker, dated February 15, 1927
Vrieslander informs Schenker that Alfred Einstein (DMV) has decided to engrave
the music examples for the second Meisterwerk volume in order to ensure a flawless
reproduction. He also reports that the width of the pages in the supplement will be
expanded, and notifies Schenker of the changes that he will make to the music examples
following this decision. Vrieslander states he has officially enquired with Einstein about
potential problems in the printing process, making clear that Schenker will not be able to
bear any additional costs for printing errors.
-
OC 54/133 Copy of a letter from Otto Vrieslander to Alfred Einstein (DMV), dated February 15,
1927
Following Einstein’s determination to have the Urlinie graphs engraved, not
hand-drawn, Vrieslander asks that the engraver pays particular attention to the shape of the
large slurs, and suggests a meeting with the engraver to go over further problems. If the
graphs were relegated to an appendix, they could be as wide as necessary, for sake of
clarity.
-
OC 54/134 Typed letter from Otto Vrieslander to Schenker, dated February 20, 1927
Vrieslander, at pains to ensure that the music illustrations in the second
Meisterwerk Yearbook are accurately and elegantly printed, reports that the engravers are
having difficulty interpreting Schenker’s music examples. He is putting his own work to one
side in order to work exclusively on creating clear and elegant graphs; he proposes to come
to Vienna in mid-March to go through all his work with Schenker.
-
OJ 14/45, [61] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated February 23, 1927
Following a brief description of a recent illness, Violin replies to
Schenker's question about accepting the Order of Merit from the Viennese Academy of Art and
Science and advises him to accept it. He realizes that staying in Hamburg would be bad for
his son's long-term health and has spoken to Artur Schnabel about the possibility of moving
to Berlin or Frankfurt. An influential man in Frankfurt is the father-in-law of Paul Klenau;
Violin knows of Klenau's respect for Schenker, and asks his friend to write to Klenau in
support of his application for a post there.
-
OJ 8/4, [46] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, postmarked [February] 26,
1927
Responding to a request from Violin, Schenker says he will write to Paul von
Klenau on behalf of Violin, apparently in connection with a possible position in
Frankfurt.
-
OJ 8/4, [47] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated February 27, 1927
Schenker is about to write to Paul von Klenau on Violin's behalf, but asks
whether he should wait until Easter, as suggested in Violin's previous
letter.
-
OJ 14/45, [62] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated March 2, 1927
Violin thanks Schenker for his willingness to intervene on his behalf with
regard to a position in Frankfurt, and asks him to get in touch with Paul von Klenau before
a possible meeting in person at Easter.
-
OJ 10/3, [57] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated March 13, 1927
Deutsch asks Schenker to recommend Dr. Willy Kahl (Cologne) to write for the
Bonn General-Anzeiger. He reports the arrival of galley proofs (for the second Meisterwerk
yearbook).
-
OJ 10/3, [58] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated March 24, 1927
Deutsch will probably attend a lecture given by Wolfgang Graeser, and
encourages Schenker to do the same.
-
OJ 14/45, [63] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated March 31, 1927
In reply to Schenker's recent postcards, Violin maintains that Klenau's
support for his appointment in Frankfurt is important, as the Ministry of Education in
Berlin can exert only a limited amount of pressure on the Frankfurt circle.
-
OJ 10/3, [59] Typewritten express postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated April 14,
1927
Deutsch invites the Schenkers for afternoon tea at the weekend; Hoboken and
Vrieslander will also be there.
-
OJ 10/3, [60] Typewritten express postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated April 21,
1927
Deutsch looks forwarded to seeing the Schenkers at Hoboken’s place. The
Society of the Friends of Music would like their print of a Haydn sketchleaf to be returned;
Eusebius Mandyczewki is unable to find a copy of Scarlatti’s Op. 1 (a collection of six
keyboard sonatas).
-
WSLB 375 Handwritten letter from Schenker to UE, dated April 25, 1927
Having gained access to the facsimile of the "Appassionata" Sonata, Schenker
sends revisions to his edition.
-
OJ 10/3, [61] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated May 9, 1927
Deutsch asks Schenker to lend him the April 1927 issue of Der Schriftsteller.
He is grateful for having been introduced to the artist Viktor Hammer. He recommends that
Schenker visit the Beethoven exposition in the City Hall, and also the Planetarium, where an
“optical organ” is on display.
-
OJ 10/3, [62] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated May 11, 1927
Deutsch has been invited to pose for an album of the Beethoven Committee; he
enquires whether Schenker has accepted an invitation to do so, in which case he will do the
same. He is delighted to learn that the (Photogram) Archive has been
agreed.
-
OJ 5/7a, [10] (formerly vC 10) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated June 1, 1927
Schenker congratulates Cube on appointment to professorship; reports that Oppel
has been appointed to a professorship at the Leipzig Conservatory, and on the spread of
Schenker's theory elsewhere; looks forward to visit from Cube.
-
OJ 10/3, [63] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated June 4, 1927
Deutsch has found a reference to the autograph manuscript of Beethoven’s Piano
Sonata in G, Op. 79, and tells Schenker he can find out more about it from the British
Museum. The Hammers are visiting him on Wednesday (June 8), and he hopes that the Schenkers
will be able to join them.
-
OJ 6/7, [34] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated June 30, 1927
Schenker answers Violin's birthday greetings letter philosophically. He is
able to work on the final version Der freie Satz at leisure and in good spirits. He reports
on the establishment of an archive of photographic reproductions of autograph and gives an
account of a visit from Violin's sister Fanny: in return for a picture of Karl Violin, he is
enclosing two pictures of himself and one of Jeanette. Finally, he urges his friend to spend
part of the summer in Galtür.
-
WSLB 385 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to UE, dated June 30, 1927
Has UE forgotten to send him a copy of his own revised edition of the
"Appassionata" Sonata?
-
OJ 89/1, [1] Handwritten letter from Schenker to van Hoboken, dated July 3, 1927
Schenker gives Hoboken Furtwängler's summer address and urges him to contact the
latter, which could yield advantage, not least for the Photogrammarchiv. — Has seen Schindler's
Beethoven biography with notes on performance. — Notifies Hoboken of the normalizing of his fee
at 50 schillings per lesson.
-
DLA 69.930/15 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Halm, dated July 11, 1927
Thanking Halm for his Beethoven book, he believes that their misunderstandings
could be removed and hopes Der freie Satz will help bring that about; gives order of publication
for Meisterwerk II and Der freie Satz, and compares his "Das Organische der Fuge" with the work
of others on Bach. — Schenker took no part in the Vienna Beethoven festival. — Describes his
correspondence with Hindemith.
-
OJ 52/898 Receipt for bank transaction from the Post Office Savings Bank to Schenker, dated July
14, 1927
Receipt for sum of 221.48 shillings [from UE].
-
OJ 11/16, [6] Handwritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated July 18, 1927
Furtwängler mentions several mutual acquaintances, and hopes to see Schenker in
Vienna.
-
OJ 10/3, [66] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated August 2, 1927
Deutsch has obtained a copy of the first edition of Schindler’s Beethoven
biography, which he will send to Galtür.
-
OJ 6/7, [35] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated August 5, 1927
In a wide-ranging letter, Schenker underscores the importance of his friend's
taking a holiday, and tries to persuade him to visit him in Galtür. There he was visited by
Reinhard Oppel, who has been appointed to a theory post at the Leipzig Conservatory, where
he will teach from Schenker's texts. He comments at length on the decline of society, as
exemplified by the July Revolt. The second Meisterwerk volume has gone to the bookbinders;
until it is published, he will be working on Der freier Satz.
-
OJ 11/54, [14] Handwritten letter from van Hoboken to Schenker, dated August 7, 1927
Hoboken reports on recent travels, including the July 15, 1927 Vienna riots. – He
has made progress on his index of Haydn's works, and has purchased some Beethoven first
editions. – He hopes to meet Furtwängler soon, and has recently heard from Vrieslander. – He
asks Schenker to inscribe a copy of Meisterwerk 2 to John Petrie Dunn.
-
OJ 89/1, [2] Handwritten letter from Schenker to van Hoboken, dated August 12, 1927
Schenker acknowledges van Hoboken's letter, OJ 11/54, 14, dated August 7, 1927;
encloses seven articles; responds regarding Haydn, Furtwängler, the "Appeal" for the
Photogrammarchiv, an exhibition in Frankfurt, John Petrie Dunn, Reinhard Oppel, Das Meisterwerk
in der Musik, vol. II, Otto Erich Deutsch, and an honorarium; and sends best wishes for the
Hobokens' trip to Switzerland, reporting on von Cube.
-
OJ 14/45, [67] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated August 13, 1927
Violin reports that he was hoping to get away, but things came up that he had
to deal with, which made the summer the saddest of his life. His wife and son will move to
Vienna in the fall, and he will be there for Christmas.
-
OJ 89/1, [3] Handwritten letter from Schenker to van Hoboken, dated August 20, 1927
Schenker has a reply from Furtwängler, saying that he is about to see Hoboken. —
Final proofs of Meisterwerk II have arrived; where should he have a copy sent to Hoboken? —
Discusses possible meeting with Furtwängler (refers to Furtwängler's attitude toward the
"moderns"). — Reports visit by von Cube.
-
OJ 11/54, [15] Handwritten letter from van Hoboken to Schenker, dated August 28, 1927
Hoboken reports on meeting with Furtwängler regarding the Photogrammarchiv, and
expresses the hope that it will be possible to interest Furtwängler in performance according to
the sources in the Archive; he encloses the final version of the "Aufruf" for the Archive, and
discusses negotiations with the Austrian National Library and Ministry of Education. — Comments
on Oppel's plan to teach in Leipzig. — Agrees to Schenker's lesson plan and fee for 1927/28. —
Describes his travel plans, which include meetings with Louis Koch in Frankurt, Ludwig
Schiedermair in Bonn, contact with John Petrie Dunn in England, C. S. Terry in Scotland, and
Maurice Cauchie in Paris, and photographing [of sources] at the [Paris] Conservatory.
-
OJ 89/1, [4] Handwritten letter from Schenker to van Hoboken, dated September 6, 1927
Schenker comments on Hoboken's Appeal [for the Photogrammarchiv], sets out what
is necessary for correctly reading an autograph manuscript and understanding its relationship to
the first edition, and rails against the tendency of performers, including Furtwängler, to think
such matters trivial.
-
OJ 5/7a, [11] (formerly vC 11) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated September 7, 1927
Schenker acknowledges Cube's postcards; Cube will receive the appeal [for photostats of
MSS].
-
WSLB 388 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to UE, dated September 10, 1927
Acknowledges copy of revised edition of the "Appassionata"
Sonata.
-
OJ 89/1, [5] Handwritten letter from Schenker to van Hoboken, dated September 13, 1927
Schenker acknowledges OJ 11/54, [17], and discusses the nature of a "prospectus"
and the suitability of Vrieslander's text for that purpose. — He expresses an interest in
Hoboken's latest discoveries, and asks whether the latter could inquire in London as to the
whereabouts of the autograph manuscript of Beethoven's Op. 106.
-
OJ 11/54, [18] Handwritten letter from van Hoboken to Schenker, dated September 18, 1927
Van Hoboken reports on his visit to John Petrie Dunn: his career, his grasp of
Schenker's theory, his situation at Edinburgh University, his publications. — Tomorrow he is to
visit C. S. Terry.
-
OJ 11/32, [2] Typed letter from Robert Haas to Schenker, dated September 30, 1927
Haas invites Schenker to view the Photogrammarchiv.
-
OJ 10/3, [69] Typewritten picture postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated October 6,
1927
Deutsch regrets that Drei Masken Verlag has not yet sent Schenker his
complimentary copies [of the second Meisterwerk yearbook]; they will send an invoice for the
production costs. Hoboken ought to receive an honor from the Austrian state only after the
Photogrammarchiv is up and running. Deutsch has much to show Schenker from the first
editions of Beethoven sonatas. He wants to arrange a time to go through the corrections to
Schubert’s Symphony in B minor.
-
OJ 10/3, [70] Typewritten picture postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated October 11,
1927
Deutsch has seen Otto Vrieslander, who surprisingly did not mention the recent
publication of his songs. He explains how different early print-runs of Beethoven’s works
may display telling differences, and how parallel publications in different cities could
sometimes show changes attributable to the composer (as is typically found in
Chopin).
-
OJ 10/3, [71] Typewritten picture postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated October 15,
1927
Deutsch accepts an invitation to the Schenkers on Wednesday, October 19. –
Drei Masken Verlag have told him that they have already paid Schenker’s honorarium and sent
him complementary copies [of the second Meisterwerk yearbook] in January and that the second
payment came to him from their branch in Vienna. – He has been working on a Beethoven
catalogue but must now turn his attention to Mozart, and then to Schubert.
-
OJ 10/3, [72] Typewritten picture postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated October 24,
1927
Deutsch has spoken to Alfred Kalmus about the revisions that Schenker (with
Deutsch’s assistance) has proposed for a reprinting of the score of Schubert’s “Unfinished”
Symphony. Kalmus said that time was pressing and he was unable to show the two men the
changes before the work went to press.
-
OJ 9/8, [4] Handwritten picture postcard from Wilhelm Altmann to Schenker, dated November 8,
1927
Altmann thanks Schenker for Masterwork 2; — Has retired but is temporarily
continuing in his position; — Reports publication of his handbook for string quartet
players.
-
OJ 14/45, [68] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated November 13, 1927
Violin thanks Schenker for sending him the second volume of Meisterwerk, which
he regards as a milestone in offering the strongest statement of his theories. He is
accompanying a cellist in early January and will not be able to get to Vienna at Christmas
after all. His wife and son – who is now able to get up and around – are hoping to go to
Vienna at Easter.
-
OJ 10/3, [73] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated November 14, 1927
Deutsch has had a telephone call from Alfred Kalmus, who reported that
Schenker’s revised copy of Schubert’s “Unfinished” Symphony has been messed up, that it will
be returned to him, with a second, clean copy, and that Kalmus may visit Schenker to
apologize for this. – Deutsch will lend Schenker a copy of stories by Balzac, two of which
may be of interest from a musical point of view. He also hopes that work can be found for
the precocious Gerald Warburg.
-
OJ 8/4, [52] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated November 16, 1927
Schenker congratulates Violin on obtaining many private pupils, and for his
continued activity as a performer. He expresses his joy that Violin's son Karl will be
visiting Vienna next year.
-
OJ 10/3, [74] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated November 22, 1927
Deutsch suspects that with the typesetters' "messing up" of Schenker’s revised
copy of Schubert’s “Unfinished” Symphony the material has been made illegible. — He has been
in contact with people regarding a possible radio talk by Schenker, and one by himself on
the redesigning of the Mozarteum. — He reports that the pianist Heinz Jolles would like
Schenker to prepare an edition of one of Beethoven’s variation sets (WoO 80 or the
“Diabelli”), and that Josef Braunstein is gratified to hear of Schenker’s interest in his
recent book on the "Leonore" overtures.
-
OJ 89/1, [7] Handwritten letter from Schenker to van Hoboken, dated December 5, 1927
Schenker praises a notice in the Neue freie Presse about the Photogrammarchiv,
and speaks of the task that lies ahead.
-
OJ 89/1, [9] Handwritten double letter from Heinrich to Anthony van Hoboken and from Jeanette to
Annamarie van Hoboken, dated December 27, 1927
While commenting adversely on Křenek's opera "Jonny spielt auf," Heinrich sends
best wishes for the New Year and thanks for cactuses, acknowledges receipt of a check, and sends
greetings to Otto Vrieslander. — Jeanette thanks Annamarie van Hoboken for the Christmas
greetings and gift.
-
OC 52/910 Typed letter from Hugo Winter (UE) to Schenker, dated December 29, 1927
Announces that Schenker's 1927 royalty has been transferred.
-
OJ 6/7, [36] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated December 29, 1927
Sending greetings for the New Year, Schenker expresses the hope that his
friend's fortunes will begin to improve in 1928. He agrees with Violin's pronouncements on
Vrieslander’s character and ability to convey Schenker's thoughts, and has no idea of what
to expect in Vrieslander's (supposedly) forthcoming monograph on him. Weisse, whom he
regards as a more skilled interpreter of his work, has announced plans for a monthly
journal, Die Tonkunst, to be edited with his pupils Oswald Jonas and Felix Salzer, which
will be based exclusively on Schenker's theoretical approach. But he is afraid that Weisse
might leave Vienna, to teach at Damrosch's music school.
-
OJ 52/899 Receipt for bank transaction from the Post Office Savings Bank to Schenker, dated
January 16, 1928
Receipt for sum of 148.02 shillings [from UE].
-
OJ 10/3, [76] Typewritten picture postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated January 27,
1928
Deutsch has spoken to Alfred Kalmus about the revisions that Schenker (with
Deutsch’s assistance) has proposed for a reprinting of the score of Schubert’s “Unfinished”
Symphony. Kalmus said that time was pressing and he was unable to show the two men the
changes before the work went to press.
-
OJ 5/7a, [13] (formerly vC 13) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated February 12, 1928
Schenker expresses joy at Cube's report of his class and private teaching; refers
to Hoboken's "Aufruf" and Vrieslander's prospectus; reports Weisse's plan for a monthly
periodical; thanks Cube for his efforts with book dealers in Duisburg and
Essen.
-
OJ 11/54, [22] Handwritten letter from Hoboken to Schenker, dated March 11, 1928
Hoboken recounts the difficulties he is having in getting 2,500 photographs of
autograph manuscripts made at the Paris Conservatory.
-
OJ 89/2, [4] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated March 16, 1928
Schenker speaks of Hoboken's Photogrammarchiv as a "grand contribution," and of
the work to be done there; reports on a copy of Beethoven Sonata, Op. 90, by Archduke Rudolph. —
He will show Hoboken recent articles by Dahms and Vrieslander, and inquires about Hoboken's
birthday.— Furtwängler may come to Vienna permanently.
-
OJ 10/3, [80] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated March 19, 1928
Deutsch reports that Eusebius Mandyczewski, the Archivist at the Gesellschaft
der Musikfreunde, would like to prepare a revised edition of Schubert’s “Unfinished”
Symphony, and asks Schenker if he would be prepared to make his textual notes on the
symphony available to him.
-
OJ 11/54, [23] Handwritten letter from Hoboken to Schenker, dated March 21, 1928
Hoboken has still made no progress on photographic work at the Paris
Conservatory. — He will go to Rotterdam and Münster. — Speaks of the importance of his Archive
work and contacts he has made. Will probably go to a concert featuring music of Alban Berg. — He
asks Schenker to intervene with O. E. Deutsch.
-
OJ 10/3, [81] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated March 25, 1928
Deutsch’s plans to give a pre-concert talk on the radio have been messed up by
Max Ast at Austrian Radio. -- He asks Schenker to tell him about the authentic copies of
Beethoven’s works made for Archduke Rudolph. -- He has been on the track of a German mass
for the dead by Schubert (the Deutsche Trauermesse) and would like to show Schenker his work
on it.
-
OJ 10/3, [82] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated March 26, 1928
Deutsch writes about the sketches for a symphony in E major by Schubert, in
the possession of the Royal College of Music in London. He would like to have a copy made so
that the work can be published – possibly by Oxford University Press. The costs should be
borne by the publisher, not the Photogram Archive, which would nonetheless get a copy of the
reproduction.
-
OJ 89/2, [5] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated March 26, 1928
Schenker conveys Deutsch's response to van Hoboken's questioning of a planned
facsimile of Schubert sketches. — Schenker discusses strategy for persuading Paris to supply
photographs for the Photogrammarchiv.
-
OJ 10/3, [83] Typewritten picture postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated April 16,
1928
Deutsch has had sharp words with Max Ast at Austrian Radio. He wants to give a
talk on Schubert’s lost “Gastein” (or “Gmunden”) Symphony and hopes that publicity from the
broadcasting company will eventually lead to the rediscovery of the manuscript. Eusebius
Mandyczewski is preparing a new edition of the “Unfinished” Symphony for Breitkopf &
Härtel; the Philharmonia pocket score, with Schenker’s and Deutsch’s revisions, is now in
print. Deutsch has discovered that the first edition of Beethoven’s Piano Sonata Op. 90
exists in two versions.
-
OJ 9/34, [11] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated April 24, 1928
Cube describes difficulties with his colleagues, loss of pupils, and reactions to
his lecture; Scheuermann and Schmemann will put Schenker exhibits in their shop windows, items
requested; inquires after Weisse journal plan.
-
WSLB 395 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to UE, dated April 25, 1928
Schenkers asks for the Tonwille volumes to be sent to Julius
Gold.
-
OJ 5/7a, [14] (formerly vC 14) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated April 29, 1928
Schenker sympathizes with Cube over the hostilities he faces; contrasts his own theory to the
approach of Riemann. Has arranged for Hammer portraits to be sent to Cube [for bookshop exhibits], and directs him
to biographical information about himself. Describes the trials of his 20s, which were surpassed by the difficulties
he faced later with publishers and organizations. Upholds Joachim and Messchaert as models of performance art, and
speaks of his contact with Brahms. Asks whether Cube will be joining him in Galtür in the summer.
-
OJ 10/3, [84] Typewritten picture postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated May 1, 1928
Deutsch has picked up a copy of his and Schenker’s recent edition of the
“Unfinished” Symphony; he has made a complaint to Universal Edition and let the publisher
know of Schenker’s displeasure with the-- He is going away for a few days, but returning to
give a radio broadcast on Schubert’s settings of Walter Scott.
-
OJ 10/3, [85] Typewritten picture postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated May 15, 1928
Deutsch thanks Schenker for his kind words (about his recent radio broadcast)
and describes the difficulties in preparing things for publication in Radio Wien. He informs
Schenker that Brahms’s arrangement of a Schubert song has already been published. He has
discovered that the Guitar Quartet believed to be by Schubert is an arrangement, and that an
early cantata, Die Advokaten, is also based on the work of another
composer.
-
OJ 9/34, [12] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated May 24, 1928
Cube acknowledges receipt of the Hammer engravings and reports on the planned
Scheuermann exhibition; reports on a forthcoming lecture and seminar, and the growth of his
student numbers.
-
OJ 5/7a, [15] (formerly vC 15) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated May 28, 1928
Schenker sends Cube an article written for the Beethoven centenary festival and suggests a
"connection" between Bonn and Düsseldorf; refers to American professors teaching the Urlinie in the USA;
outlines summer plans.
-
OJ 10/3, [87] Handwrittenwritten picture postcard from Hanna and Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker,
dated June 10, 1928
The Deutsches hope to see the Schenkers once before both couples go away for
the summer, and they invite them for tea on Tuesday, June 12.
-
OJ 10/3, [88] Typewritten picture postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated June 14,
1928
Deutsch can show Schenker the reissue (Titelauflage) of Beethoven’s Sonata Op.
6 if he is interested. -- On the 27th, he is giving a radio broadcast on Schubert’s lost
symphony; he has obtained funding ($1,000) for the person who finds it. -- He is giving
another radio talk on July 3, on Schubert’s incidental music to Rosamunde.
-
OJ 6/7, [38] Handwritten letter, with envelope, from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated June 23,
1928
Schenker thanks Violin for his kind birthday greetings, explaining the
discrepant birth dates assigned to him. He reaffirms his spiritual solidarity with his
friend. He has read some articles and reviews mentioning his work, at all of which he
laughs.
-
OJ 5/7a, [17] (formerly vC 17) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated July 13, 1928
Schenker offers consoling words for low turn-out to Düsseldorf lecture; praises
recent article by Cube, but corrects overstated connection between himself and Brahms and
Joachim.
-
OJ 52/900 Receipt for bank transaction from Post Office Savings Bank, dated July 16,
1928
Receipt for sum of 162.26 shillings [from UE].
-
OJ 14/45, [71] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated July 18, 1928
Owing to a "complete breakdown," Violin is recovering at a sanatorium in
Schierke, from where he writes. In response to Schenker's previous postcard, Violin had
written more than once to Prof. [Fritz?] Stein for the return of the manuscript of a Handel
arrangement by Schenker, and he will chase him up in August. A pupil of his, Harry Hahn, has
taken upon himself to lecture on Schenker's theories at the local society of composers; for
this he has prepared classroom-size enlargements of voice-leading graphs of a Bach prelude
and a Schubert waltz, and has proved a surprisingly competent and persuasive
speaker.
-
WSLB 397 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to UE, dated August 5, 1928
Schenker asks why he has not received his royalty.
-
OC 52/914 Typed letter from Ernst Roth (UE) to Schenker, dated August 20, 1928
UE understands that the royalty payment has now been made.
-
OJ 11/54, [24] Typed letter from Hoboken to Schenker, dated August 27, 1928
Hoboken recounts his and his wife's travels through Germany, including encounters
with Thomas Mann and others. He expects to return to Vienna in mid-October.
-
OJ 89/2, [7] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated September 5, 1928
The Schenkers have just returned to Vienna. — The "fantastic nature" of the
Hobokens' travels by auto. — The exceptional heat in Galtür. —Salzburg as magnificent but
too small to hold Mozart.
-
OJ 10/3, [92] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated September 27, 1928
Deutsch gives Schenker information about Brahms’s arrangement of a Schubert
song ("Ellens zweiter Gesang") and the guitar quartet attributed to
Schubert.
-
OJ 10/3, [94] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated October 3, 1928
Deutsch apologies for being late to his meeting with Schenker, because his
clock was running 10 minutes slow.
-
OJ 9/34, [14] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated October 4, 1928
Cube acknowledges OJ 5/7a, [18] and [19], and comments; reports on his own recent activities and
plans, and on events in the Conservatory, on a forthcoming Schubert festival, and Radio Vienna. He is about to
return the Hammer etching.
-
OJ 5/7a, [20] (formerly vC 20) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated October 8, 1928
Schenker acknowledges receipt of Hammer portrait; urges Cube when in Cologne to
visit Gerhard Albersheim's parents and Felix Hupka.
-
OJ 8/4, [58] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 9, 1928
Schenker is glad to hear that his friend's setback was only a minor one. He
has received a nice letter from Harry Hahn, together with a copy of his lecture and the
splendid voice-leading diagrams.
-
OJ 10/1, [103] Typewritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated November 23, 1928
Dahms is unable to attend the Schubert conference in Vienna. — His latest
appeals on marital situation have been rejected.
-
PhA/Ar 56, [9] Typewritten letter of confirmation from Schenker to Kromer, dated December 12,
1928
Schenker acknowledges receipt of Beethoven photograms.
-
OC 52/915 Typed letter from Hugo Winter (UE) to Schenker, dated December 27, 1928
Announces that Schenker's 1928 royalty has been transferred.
-
OJ 14/45, [75] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated February 25, 1929
Violin has heard terrible things from Vienna on account of the extremely cold
weather, and hope that the Schenkers are in good health. His brother-in-law will take him on
holiday at Easter, and also pay for a family holiday in the summer.
-
OJ 14/45, [76] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated March 3, 1929
On the point of departing for the Riviera with his brother-in-law – possibly
via Vienna – Violin asks Schenker to make a quick assessment of his voice-leading reduction
of Bach's first Two-Part Invention, in C major.
-
OJ 6/7, [42] Handwritten letter, with envelope, from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated March 7,
1929
In reply to Violin's previous letter, Schenker writes out a graphic analysis
of Bach's Two-Part Invention in C major, and wishes him an enjoyable holiday on the French
Riviera.
-
OJ 14/45, [77] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated March 20, 1929
Violin thanks Schenker for his letter with the voice-leading sketch of Bach's
C major Invention, and for the article from Der Kunstwart on the Photogram Archive. He is
enjoying the climate of Nice, and seems to be getting on well with the French language; a
lady who overheard him playing the piano praised his expressive playing.
-
OJ 9/34, [16] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated March 26, 1929
Cube is listening by radio to music being performed in Vienna. The two caricatures are his
fellow composition teachers at Duisburg. Reports on his work at Cologne Conservatory: success with previous
lectures, and forthcoming lecture series.
-
OJ 9/34, [17] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated April 5, 1929
Miss Edith Sauerbrey may call on Schenker.
-
OJ 9/34, [18] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated May 14, 1929
Cube explores the possibility of a student of his, Erich Voss, studying with
Schenker.
-
OJ 5/7a, [23] (formerly vC 23) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated May 15, 1929
Gerhard Albersheim will leave a space in Schenker's calendar that Schenker offers
to Erich Voss; will teach him himself because Weisse may not be up to date with Der freie Satz;
Voss to contact him.
-
OJ 14/45, [79] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated June 16, 1929
In spite of an earlier promise, Violin says he cannot visit the Schenkers in
Galtür because he must stay with his son, who has had an inflammation of his kidney
following the news of the death of Otto Schreier. He will instead take his son on a holiday
in the Harz Mountains, and hopes to visit Vienna in the autumn or over
Christmas.
-
OJ 5/7a, [24] (formerly vC 24) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated July 6, 1929
Schenker has heard again from Erich Voß about lessons and shows signs of
annoyance. Has completed his "Eroica" study, and Der freie Satz looms.
-
OJ 89/3, [3] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Hoboken to Schenker, dated July 7,
1929
Hoboken recounts recent travels. — Is now at Kliffende, where he is about to
build a house. — Reports meetings with Hubermann and Harburger; encloses a letter and articles
from the latter. — Refers to a Vrieslander problem.
-
OJ 89/3, [4] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated July 12, 1929
Schenker thanks Hoboken for the Harburger items and agrees to write to
Vrieslander.
-
OJ 5/7a, [25] (formerly vC 25) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated July 14, 1929
Voß is coming to Vienna.
-
OJ 52/901 Receipt for bank transaction from the Post Office Savings Bank to Schenker, dated July
19, 1929
Receipt for sum of 97.60 shillings [from UE].
-
WSLB 411 Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to UE, dated July 19, 1929
Requests half-yearly statement of account.
-
WSLB 414 Handwritten letter from Schenker to UE, dated July 27, 1929
Schenker comments on Schmid's remarks; inquires after editorship of Mozart
edition.
-
OJ 15/16, [62] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 5, 1929
Weisse, absorbed by Schenker's ideas (especially the concept of "tonal space")
tells of his plans to write about his teacher's significance as a contemporary theorist. He
describes his progress in composition, which includes the completion of a set of six bagatelles
for piano and a Clarinet Quintet, and much work on an Octet. He asks about progress on Der freie
Satz and about the publication of Schenker's analysis of the "Eroica" Symphony, and reports his
and Hertha's joy in parenthood.
-
WSLB 417 Handwritten letter from Schenker to UE, dated August 9, 1929
Reacting to Edmund Schmid's follow-up remarks, Schenker points up a favorable
passage and comments wrily on a critical one.
-
OJ 11/16, [7] Handwritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated August 30, 1929
Furtwängler comments retrospectively on the Heidelberg affair, and rejoices over
the "Eroica" monograph.
-
OJ 11/54, [26] Typewritten letter from Hoboken to [Reinhard Oppel], dated August 30, 1929
Hoboken advises Oppel on ordering materials from the Photogrammarchiv for study
purposes. — He hopes to see him in Kiel in late September.
-
OJ 89/3, [9] Typewritten letter from Hoboken to Schenker, dated September 15, 1929
Hoboken encloses his analytical study of Brahms's Intermezzo, Op. 117, No. 1,
and raises several technical matters. — He reports on his building project, and responds to
Schenker's refusal, in OJ 89/3, [7], to continue acting as intermediary with Vrieslander. —
He encloses a check for his lesson fee.
-
OJ 15/15, [44] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, postmarked October 13, 1929
Weisse seeks to arrange a meeting with Schenker during the
week.
-
OJ 14/45, [80] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated November 19, 1929
Violin apologizes for not having written, but does not want to burden Schenker
with negative thoughts. He will try to help find a publisher for the "Eroica" analysis, and
also offers some thoughts of comfort on hearing the news that Schenker's brother and
sister-in-law have separated. He has little energy left, but is somehow able to muster it
when needed, e.g. at a sold-out orchestral concert in which he played better than ever. He
promises to be in Vienna over Christmas.
-
OJ 11/16, [8] Handwritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated December 16, 1929
Furtwängler asks to visit Schenker on December 19th.
-
OJ 89/3, [A] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, undated [between November 14, 1928 and
January 1, 1929]
Schenker asks Hoboken to send a copy of a Schubert minuet to Munich, and draws
his attention to a Landshoff article and notice about the Andreas Bach
book.
-
OJ 6/7, [45] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated December 23, 1929
Schenker, expressing misgivings about the medical profession, nonetheless
hopes that Karl Violin's impending operation is successful. He is still awaiting news about
a publisher for the "Eroica" monograph; Furtwängler's illness has delayed some lines of
enquiry, and Hertzka (at Universal Edition) has not been cooperative.
-
OJ 52/902 Receipt for bank transaction from the Post Office Savings Bank to Schenker, dated
January 2, 1930
Receipt for sum of 1,250 shillings [from UE].
-
OJ 52/903 Receipt for bank transaction from the Post Office Savings Bank to Schenker, dated
January 22, 1930
Receipt for sum of 78 shillings 25 groschen [from UE].
-
OJ 6/7, [47] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated March 2, 1930
Schenker reports on two concerts at which Hans Weisse's Octet was performed
for the first time. Furtwängler was enchanted by it, Schenker was impressed by the quality
of the voice-leading in general, the construction of the finale movement (a passacaglia) in
particular. He was touched to see that a pupil of Weisse's, Dr. Felix Salzer, had subvented
the cost of the rehearsals and concerts, and the provision of food and drink for the
audience; this he compared with Antony van Hoboken's reluctance to help him with the
publication costs of his recent work.
-
OJ 15/16, [63] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated March 3, 1930
Weisse has delayed in replying to Schenker's recent letter because he has been
corrected copies of his Clarinet Quintet and Octet, which he will submit to the City of Vienna
Prize competition. He asks Schenker to help publicize the first performance of the Octet, at the
small auditorium of the Musikverein, and asks for the addresses of Angi Elias and Marianne Kahn
so that he can send them personal invitations. His wife is about to give birth to a second
child, and he hopes that Schenker's personal doctor Julius Halberstam might also be interested
in hearing the Octet.
-
OJ 89/4, [2] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Hoboken to Schenker, dated March 19,
1930
Hoboken compares performances of Beethoven's Missa solemnis by Furtwängler and
Klemperer. — He has experienced pains in his arm, and has taken recuperative lessons from
Rudolf Breithaupt. — He details work he has been doing for the Photogramm Archive, work of
his own, and that for Schenker.
-
OC B/136-138 Handwritten letter from Gerhard Albersheim to Schenker, dated March 20–21,
1930
After correction by Schenker, Albersheim has finalized an article on
Schenker's work, which he will submit to a journal. He will now prepare himself for the
state examinations.
-
OJ 89/4, [4] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Hoboken to Schenker, dated March 29,
1930
Hoboken questions Schenker's separation of "artist" from "person," and says
that he does not want to become an eternal student.
-
OJ 15/15, [46] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated April 14, 1930
Weisse expresses his unease about the dedication to Furtwängler of an article
on the "Urlinie," by Walter Riezler. He thinks that Furtwängler, who does not really
understand the term, may have put Riezler up to writing it.
-
OC 54/296 Handwritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated April 16, 1930
Furtwängler encloses a letter from Karl Straube, and cautions Schenker against
publishing with Breitkopf.
-
OC 54/298 Typewritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated May 30, 1930
Furtwängler is angry at Straube's reply, and may sound out Max Hesse — He has
resigned his Vienna position.
-
OJ 9/34, [21] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated June 25, 1930
Acknowledges OJ 5/7a, [29] and offers mitigation for Vrieslander's
non-acquaintance with the Urlinie (to which Cube has just introduced new violin teachers).
Reports on Erich Voß, and on concert plans at Conservatory. Reports on his teaching. Threat of
financial difficulties; he has offered his services to the Hochschule für Musik in
Berlin.
-
OJ 5/7a, [30] (formerly vC 30) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated July 10, 1930
Comparison of Otto Vrieslander with Hans Weisse. Weisse's Octet impressed
Furtwängler. Meisterwerk III due out in October (reports contents); is now revising Der freie
Satz.
-
OJ 6/7, [50] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 31, 1930
Schenker assures his friend that he understands his difficulties, and that he
can be proud of holding his head high above those who do not understand music, or are
incapable of interpreting it beautifully. His own problems are focussed around money,
especially as his brother (Moses) has not given him the second part of his inheritance. He
has sought to find cheaper ways of producing the music examples for his latest writings: he
is more satisfied with the Eroica examples than the engraved illustrations from previous
volumes of Das Meisterwerk in der Musik, and is planning to issue Der freie Satz with a
volume of examples that is separate from the text. He repeats the news, from an earlier
letter, of his being mentioned in Romain Rolland's most recent Beethoven book, and of his
entry in Meyers Konversations-Lexicon, and also reports on an item about him in the Deutsche
Tonkünstler-Lexikon.
-
PhA/Ar 36, [1] Carbon copy of a typewritten letter from Anthony van Hoboken to Heinrich Schenker,
dated September 15, 1930
Hoboken sends his scoring of a C. P. E. Bach harpsichord concerto for Schenker to
check in connection with a planned new collected edition of the works of that
composer.
-
OJ 6/7, [51] Handwritten letter, with envelope, from Schenker to Violin, dated October 21,
1930
Writing after a long and serious illness, Schenker assures his friend that he
is alive and well. The doctors have pronounced him generally fit, but he suffers from a
painful tightening of the thorax, and also a flickering that causes him to "lose" letters
and notes. He has had to give many double-lessons of late, in theory, which he finds tiring.
To Hoboken, who, though gifted, is concerned only about his money and often comes to lessons
without having prepared anything, he would rather play than give over-long lectures. He is
concerned, for his own sake as much as for Weisse's, about the lectures in Berlin that
Weisse will deliver, and about his eagerness to debate with Alfred Lorenz; he is glad that
Violin is going to Berlin, and will give him instructions about what to do there. His
Beethoven sonata edition brings in 100 shillings per month – a good deal for the publishers
– and his brother still has half of his inheritance. But he is still alive – with Der freie
Satz.
-
OJ 15/15, [47] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated November 9, 1930
Weisse asks Schenker for the address of Reinhard Oppel, who may be able to
provide names of people in Berlin whom Weisse could invite to his forthcoming lecture
there.
-
OJ 5/7a, [33] (formerly vC 33) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated November 10, [1930]
Discusses attendance at Weisse's forthcoming lecture in Berlin; refers to two
articles in Die Musik.
-
WSLB 423 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to UE, dated November 11, 1930
Schenker confirms the consent he has given to the Kiel student
body.
-
PhA/Ar 56, [4] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Haas, dated November 12, 1930
Schenker offers Haas a line of inquiry for tracing Beethoven source
materials.
-
OJ 11/32, [4] Typed letter from Robert Haas to Schenker, dated November 17, 1930
The proposed C. P. E. Bach contract is not yet clinched; hopes to see Schenker
and Hoboken soon.
-
OJ 6/7, [52] Letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, in Jeanette Schenker's hand, dated November
26, 1930
Schenker summarizes the achievements and ambitions of several of his pupils
and followers (Albersheim, Cube, Vrieslander, Roth, Jonas, and Weisse), noting that Weisse
is the most ambitious of all of these though he is not completely at home in the new theory.
He fears that something might go wrong at Weisse's forthcoming lecture at the Central
Institute for Music Education, and hopes that Violin will listen with a sharp ear. Weisse
will give a trial run of the lecture at the Schenkers' apartment.
-
OJ 15/15, [49] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated November 28, 1930
Weisse is delighted by the chance to rehearse his forthcoming lecture at
Schenker's apartment. His Sextet will be performed at the Musikverein in Vienna; he goes
through a list of Schenker's circle of adherents who might be invited to his forthcoming
lectures at the Central Institute for Music Education and Teaching in
Berlin.
-
OJ 11/54, [29] Typewritten letter from Hoboken to Schenker, dated December 5, 1930
Hoboken depicts the abundance of music in Berlin, contrasting Furtwängler,
Klemperer and Kleiber. — He has decided to withdraw his planned financing of the
Photogramarchiv's collected edition of C. P. E. Bach.
-
OJ 11/54, [30] Handwritten letter from Hoboken to Schenker, dated January 5, 1931
Hoboken sends New Year's greetings and speaks of next lesson.
-
OJ 11/54, [33] Handwritten picture postcard from Hoboken to Schenker, dated April 27, 1931
Hoboken reports when he will be back in Vienna.
-
OJ 11/54, [34] Handwritten letter from Hoboken to Schenker, dated April 29, 1931
Hoboken may stay at the Semmering spa for a few more days, and discusses his
next appearance for a lesson. — He discusses Specht's Bildnis Beethovens.
-
OJ 5/7a, [38] (formerly vC 38) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, in Jeanette Schenker's hand, dated June 30, 1931
Schenker encloses the [Mozart calling] card, and sends an article from Der Kunstwart; he
emphasizes that Moriz Violin's new institute is a "school," not a "seminar," and offers detailed advice;
comments that his theory from Harmonielehre to Meisterwerk constitutes a self-contained whole; recommends use of
C. P. E. Bach's Versuch with his theory applied to the examples; and foretells the Urlinie-Tafeln that should be
available to Violin/Cub in Hamburg and to Weisse in New York. His eyes have suffered and need complete
rest.
-
OJ 9/34, [27] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated September 8, 1931
Line drawing of Moriz Violin. Cube reports on health of Violin's son; discusses his
relationship with Violin, and the prospects of the Schenker Institute in Hamburg; Cube will be assisting at
a lecture given by Hans Weisse.
-
OJ 89/5, [1] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated September 29, 1931
Schenker tells Hoboken not to concern himself too much with the Urlinie: it is
the linear progressions that really matter.
-
OJ 5/11, [1a] First draft of a handwritten letter from Schenker to Furtwängler, in Jeanette
Schenker’s hand, dated November 11‒16, 1931
-
OJ 5/11, [1b] Second draft of a handwritten letter from Schenker to Furtwängler in Jeanette and
Heinrich Schenker’s hand, dated November 11‒16, 1931
-
OJ 9/34, [31] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated May 8, 1932
Cube sends Schenker an Urlinie graph of Schubert's song "Der Dopplegänger," and offers an
extended commentary. Describes his work and state of mind, and comments on working with Moriz Violin; he
expresses fears for the Hamburg Schenker Institut. He has just got married.
-
OJ 9/34, [32] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated May 11, 1932
Cube reports a conversation with Moriz Violin.
-
OJ 11/54, [39] Handwritten postcard from Hoboken to Schenker, dated May 12, 1932
Hoboken will come to see Schenker on Friday.
-
OJ 6/8, [13] Handwritten letter, with envelope, from Schenker to Violin, dated June 12,
1932
Schenker refers to his “betrayal” by Herman Roth and shares with Vrieslander’s
letter on the subject. He updates Violin on the forthcoming publication of the Fünf
Urlinie-Tafeln, accusing the Mannes School of getting more publicity and profits from the
sale of the work than it deserves.
-
OJ 12/6, [13] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated July 14, 1932
Jonas reports on his visit to Berlin, where he failed to meet with Furtwängler; —
discusses Brahms-Handel Saul and Beethoven Op. 109. — He has heard about the Fünf Urlinie-Tafeln
from Hoboken and Salzer; — discusses plans for publishing his Das Wesen des musikalischen
Kunstwerkes. — Has received books from Alfred Einstein.
-
FS 40/1, [10] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Salzer, dated July 16, 1932
Salzer will receive four copies of Fünf Urlinie-Tafeln, and is asked to
distribute them.
-
OJ 11/32, [10] Typed letter from Robert Haas to Schenker, dated July 22, 1932
Haas sends summer greetings and urges holding a Board of Trustees' meeting in
September.
-
FIBA 13/MO1 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Rudolf von Ficker, dated July 27, 1932
Schenker requests a meeting with Ficker in Igls.
-
OJ 89/5, [3] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated July 31, 1932
Schenker welcomes a visit from Hoboken and Miss Boy, and encloses a clipping of
an article.
-
OJ 5/18, 12 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Jonas, dated August 28, 1932
Schenker will return to Vienna in September and would like Jonas to visit him. —
Questions about Stern Conservatory and songs by Vrieslander.
-
OJ 12/6, [15] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated September 5, 1932
Jonas encloses sample page-make-up by Saturn-Verlag, and asks Schenker to send
addresses for recipients of invitations [to subscribe]. Reports on his professional
prospects and contacts in Berlin, and on reviewing.
-
OJ 89/5, [5] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Hoboken to Schenker, dated September 5,
1932
Hoboken sets out his plans to leave Vienna, pack his furniture and put his
music collection in store, and how he sees the continuation of his lessons with and work
under Schenker.
-
OJ 5/18, 13 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated September 7, 1932
Der freie Satz is complete, and Anthony van Hoboken has volunteered
[financial] assistance. Schenker wonders whether van Hoboken might not provide support for
Jonas, too.
-
OJ 11/32, [11] Typed letter from Robert Haas to Schenker, dated September 15, 1932
Haas asks Schenker to call on him in relation to a letter from van Hoboken
regarding the Photogrammarchiv.
-
OJ 11/16, [12] Handwritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated September 22, 1932
Furtwängler was prevented from visiting Schenker in August by having to go
into the Cottage Sanatorium, Vienna. He hopes to see Schenker during the winter, and asks
whether he might like to do the ceremonial address for the Brahms
Centenary.
-
OJ 89/5, [7] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Hoboken to Schenker, dated September 22,
1932
Hoboken is pleased at completion of Der freie Satz and reaffirms his financial
assistance for its printing. — Encloses a letter from Robert Haas and proposes a three-way
meeting. — Refers to the impact of his divorce has on his financial affairs. — May be able
to assist Jonas's publication.
-
OJ 12/6, [38] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated September 25, [1932]
Jonas reports letter from Hoboken re subscriptions to his Einführung; also
reports re publishing (Breithaupt), reviewing (for Einstein), and imminent broadcast talks,
and teaching next academic year; also re Sandra Droucker lecture on Schenker in
Oslo.
-
OJ 11/16, [13] Handwritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated November 16, 1932
Furtwängler is in Vienna and wants to visit Schenker today.
-
OJ 5/18, 17 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, incorrectly dated September 1932 [recte:
December 1, 1932]
Schenker discusses likely sales for Jonas's Das Wesen, and will himself help
promote the book; warns Jonas against Hoboken.
-
OC 18/37-38 Handwritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated December 10, 1932
Furtwängler shares Schenker's assessment of Ludwig Karpath, and has not
written a letter for publication. — He has been exploring possibilities for Schenker in
Berlin, particularly taking over a masterclass at the Akademie der Künste, with additional
lectures at the Stern'sches Conservatory. — He has heard from Hans Weisse. — He encloses a
review by Herman Roth, and comments on the latter's character.
-
OJ 6/8, [14] Handwritten letter, with envelope, from Schenker to Violin, dated December 19,
1932
In this characteristically long end-of-year letter to his friend, Schenker
mentions his forthcoming edition of Brahms’s study of consecutive octaves and fifths,
Jonas’s book on his achievements as a theorist, Zuckerkandl’s book on opera, and the
possibility of an English translation of his Theory of Harmony.
-
OC 18/43 Typewritten letter from Karpath to Schenker, dated December 31, 1932
Karpath answers Schenker's accusations against Joseph Marx among others, in a
placatory manner. — He encourages Schenker to ask Furtwängler for the awaited letter. — He
will contact Marx and Franz Schmidt.
-
Sbb 55 Nachl. 13, [8] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Furtwängler, dated January 24, 1933
Schenker has received a letter from Karpath, and alerts Furtwängler that he will
be hearing from him about the proposed letter to the newspaper; Schenker reports on recent visit
by Joseph Marx re the adaptation of Harmonielehre; Schenker would now be willing to associate
with the Akademie, but appointments there come about only by intrigue.
-
OC 18/47 Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Furtwängler to Karpath, dated February 6,
1933
Letter of recommendation by Furtwängler, which stresses expressly Schenker's
great significance as a music theorist.
-
OJ 5/18, 23 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated February 7, 1933
Schenker returns four essays with praise. Salzer is informed that the price
for Jonas's Einführung has been set too high; Schenker advises caution with
Hoboken.
-
OJ 12/6, [20] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated March 20, 1933
Van Hoboken is willing to advance 600 Mk for the Einführung; Jonas inquires,
in that regard, after the plan to reprint Schenker's Harmonielehre, indicating that he had
previously prepared a reformulation of that work for teaching purposes; — he alludes to
introductory lectures to Furtwängler concerts, and the Handel-Brahms Saul
project.
-
OJ 12/6, [21] Handwritten postcard from Jonas to Schenker, dated May 2, [1933]
Jonas thanks Schenker for Brahms study; — he will be in Vienna to see Hoboken on
16th and will visit Schenker.
-
OJ 12/6, [22] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated May 9, 1933
Jonas acknowledges OJ 5/18, 25. — If agreement can be reached on his
Einführung, he hopes for publication in the fall; — he has read the two articles by
Schenker; — he sends a recent article on Photogrammarchive; — he will be in Vienna on
16th.
-
OJ 9/34, [37] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated May 11, 1933
Cube, in response to OJ 5/7a, [45], defends his choice of a descent from 3, with neighbor-note 4, in
his analysis of the first theme of Beethoven Op. 26, mvt 1, with graphs as "proof"; he also defends political
developments in Germany, and attributes his threatened hunger to Violin's return to Vienna.
-
OJ 5/7a, [46] (formerly vC 46) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated May 14, 1933
Schenker disagrees with Cube's assertion in OJ 9/34, [37], that the Urlinie of the theme of
Beethoven, Op. 26, first movement, was a third-progression, not a fifth-progression, giving graphic proofs and
explaining Cube's misuse of the neighbor note. Hitler has done "historical service" in getting rid of Marxism;
someone is needed to get rid of musical Marxists; Schenker has created the tools. He provides background to
Moriz Violin's departure from Hamburg, reports on Jonas, Weisse, and Oppel, and inquires whether Cube has heard
from Furtwängler.
-
OJ 9/15, [3] Handwritten notecard from Elsa Bienenfeld to Schenker, dated June 6, 1933
Bienenfeld thanks Schenker for her visit to him on June 2, 1933, and invites
him to meet Felix Weingartner on June 14, 1933.
-
OJ 5/7a, [47] (formerly vC 47) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated July 18, 1933
Schenker reports on a newspaper article and abortive radio program about his theory, by
Theo Goos; also on Jonas's forthcoming book, on van Hoboken, Moriz Violin, and Hans Wolf; and on
progress with Der freie Satz.
-
OJ 11/32, [17] Typewritten letter from Robert Haas to Schenker, dated September 20, 1933
Haas promises to have the Griesinger Haydn book delivered, and mentions
several other matters.
-
OJ 5/18, 28 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Jonas, dated October 5, 1933
Schenker is circulating Jonas's article to draw attention to his [forthcoming]
book. — He does not have van Hoboken's current address.
-
OJ 5/18, 29 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Jonas, dated October 7, 1933
Schenker is forwarding issues [of the periodical containing Jonas's article]
to Hoboken.
-
OJ 12/6, [46] Handwritten postcard from Jonas to Schenker, dated October 31 [1933]]
Jonas has been sick; — he has seen Furtwängler briefly; — Jonas believes that he
will not have space for the planned appendix on the Photogramm Archive in his book; — he
inquires about Hoboken.
-
OJ 5/18, 30 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Jonas, dated November 6, 1933
Schenker reports van Hoboken's pending arrival in Vienna; — He refers to
Furtwängler and Richard Strauss.
-
OJ 12/6, [25] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated December 3, 1933
The majority of Jonas's Das Wesen des musikalischen Kunstwerks has gone to the
printer; — Furtwängler has promised to recommend it to the Berlin Hochschule für Musik; — no
word from van Hoboken. Jonas inquires after Free Composition.
-
OJ 5/18, 31 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated December 8, 1933
Schenker congratulates Jonas on handing over his volume to the printer; — he
gives van Hoboken's current address; — he has eye trouble; — comments on Furtwängler, and on
economic difficulties for music teachers in Vienna.
-
OJ 5/18, 32 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated December 13, 1933
The music examples in Das Meisterwerk were engraved; Schenker draws attention
to and commends an article [by Israel Citkowitz].
-
OJ 5/18, 33 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated December 21, 1933
Schenker sends article [by Citkowitz]. — In response to Jonas's quoting from a
Jewish lexikon, he refers to the sermons by Cardinal Faulhaber, and writes of his pride in
being Jewish but in having assimilated thoroughly enough to establish favorable relations
with the Catholic church, antisemites, and the news media. — Implying a parallel between
himself and Jesus, he offers his "monotheistic theory of music" as "a new message to the
world from the Jews." — He has no copy of his Syrische Tänze; — writes of the work's
history.
-
OJ 89/7, [2] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated January 13, 1934
Schenker encourages Hoboken to continue to live in Vienna, praising its racial
diversity; — Der freie Satz is near completion; — sales of Beethovens Neunte Sinfonie are going
well.
-
OJ 89/7, [3] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Hoboken to Schenker, dated January 15,
1934
Hoboken explains his indecision over future residence in
Vienna.
-
OJ 89/7, [4] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated January 17, 1934
Hoboken will probably not need to send money [for printing costs of Der freie
Satz] until 1935.
-
OJ 89/7, [7] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Hoboken to Schenker, dated March 15,
1934
Hoboken outlines plans to expand publicity for the Photogram Archive. —
Reports re his work on Chopin's Scherzo Op. 54, which he will bring to his April 3 lesson. —
Refers to the invitation to Schenker to contribute to the journal of the
Reichsmusikkammer.
-
OJ 12/6, [30] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated March 16, 1934
Jonas has mailed off the book [to his publisher]; he hopes that Schenker will
approve of it [when eventually he sees it]. It comprises four chapters and two appendices. —
He thanks Schenker for the gift of his Syrian Dances. — The Director of the Hochschule für
Musik in Berlin, Fritz Stein, has written that he cannot arrange a position for Jonas,
whereas Jonas (with support from Furtwängler) had sought only students to whom to give
[private] lessons. — Jonas alludes to difficult conditions under which he is working, and
describes his conflict with piano teacher Georg Bertram. — Relations with van Hoboken are
strained, despite Jonas's having included an appendix about the Photogrammarchiv in his
book.
-
OJ 12/6, [29] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated March 30, 1934
Jonas wishes the Schenkers a happy Easter. — His book expected out April 20:
Jonas wonders if it would be a good idea to ask Furtwängler for a letter for
it.
-
OJ 5/18, 38 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated April 7, 1934
Further to OJ 5/18, 37, Schenker reports his conversation with Hoboken, who
praised Jonas's book, then asked Schenker's opinion on how best to display the music
examples. Schenker attempts diplomatically to explain Hoboken's pettiness. — Furtwängler is
in Vienna. — Schenker praises Jonas's activities.
-
OJ 12/6, [31] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated April 15, 1934
Jonas acknowledges three communications; Hoboken has increased his subvention
for Jonas's book; Furtwängler has agreed to write a supporting letter. — Jonas proposes a
series of individual critical introductions to most frequently performed piano works and
concertos.
-
OJ 5/18, 41 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated April 23, 1934
Free Composition is completed. Schenker is pleased that Hoboken has come
round; — he gives Weisse's address; — Schenker has ordered five copies of Jonas's book; — he
reports that Salzer has completed a new book; — questions Jonas about his new plan, but
welcomes it; — Goos may not realize that Schenker is a Jew.
-
FS 40/1, [23] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Salzer, dated June 11, 1934
Hoping that he and Jeanette will be able to get away on the 15th, Schenker
reports a conversation with Furtwängler, and the latter's praise for Jonas.
-
OJ 12/6, [32] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated June 11, 1934
Publication of Jonas's book has been delayed until June 22; — he may give a
lecture in conjunction with Edwin Fischer; — his Beethoven sketches article is in press; —
Hoboken is considering Jonas's proposed elucidatory edition plan in conjunction with a
putative publication by the Photogram Archive.
-
OJ 15/22, [7] Handwritten letter from Willfort to Schenker, dated June 14, 1934
Willfort, writing from Berlin, has been unable to make contact with Furtwängler.
— He has spent time with Jonas; — is disappointed that Schenker will not be in Vienna to hear
him conduct the Brahms' "Tragic" Overture; — gives travel plans; — inquires after Schenker's
reaction to his work on the "Moonlight" Sonata.
-
OJ 12/6, [33] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated June 29, 1934
Jonas describes his summer travel plans, including Bayreuth; hopes to meet
Schenker in Vienna in August. Reports state of play on his book, a proof copy of which
Furtwängler is reading. Reports on recent lecture, and prospect of another
lecture.
-
OJ 14/1, [2] Handwritten letter from Salzer to Schenker, dated July 16, 1934
Salzer reports that he has secured his contract with Saturn Verlag. — He and his
wife have agreed to separate.
-
OJ 12/6, [34] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated July 19, 1934
Jonas acknowledges two postcards, thanks Schenker for his note [re Das Wesen
des musikalischen Kunstwerks]; has heard nothing from Hoboken; Furtwängler is too busy to
read the book now; Jonas is going to Bayreuth. An errata list will have to be produced for
the book.
-
OJ 5/18, 47 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated July 22, 1934
Schenker praises Jonas's book highly; gives Hoboken's current address; —
Furtwängler has written a recommendation for Moriz Violin, who would like go to Jerusalem;
asks whether Vrieslander and Oppel are subscribers. — Comments on Bayreuth and
Wagner.
-
OJ 12/6, [35] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated July 25, 1934
Jonas has changed his travel plans; describes Bayreuth; sends corrigenda list
for his Das Wesen; Roth is working on continuo realizations of Handel.
-
OJ 15/22, [8] Handwritten letter from Willfort to Schenker, dated July 30, 1934
Willfort reports progress in his conducting career; he will be in Vienna next
academic year; has the prospect of a radio concert with RAVAG in September.
-
OJ 12/6, [36] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated August 6, [1934]
Jonas alludes to the Dolfuss assassination; gives his reactions to Bayreuth
(which he has just visited) and the Wagner cult. — He is seeing his publisher about the
proposed commentary editions.
-
OJ 5/18, 50 Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Jonas, dated August 7, 1934
Schenker suggests the publisher should send Vrieslander a copy of Jonas's
book; — Hoboken's plans to be in Vienna.
-
OJ 5/18, 51 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated August 18, [1934]
Schenker re-sends a postcard that has been returned; mentions a visit by the
Hobokens
-
OC 44/20 Handwritten postcard from Jonas to Schenker, dated [September 3, 1934]
Jonas would like to pay a visit to Schenker; — he has heard nothing from
Hoboken; — he is remaining in Vienna.
-
OC 44/21 Handwritten postcard from Jonas to Schenker, dated September 18, [1934]
Jonas is back in Berlin; reports on elucidatory editions, and seeks advice; —
he refers to Klemperer and Furtwängler, — he has received letter from Landshoff; —
forthcoming lectures in Vienna.
-
OC 44/43 Handwritten letter from Jonas and Hans Wolf to Schenker, dated September 24,
1934
Jonas reports on complimentary copies of Das Wesen and the plans for the
elucidatory editions. — He hopes to enlist Furtwängler in supporting Hans Wolf's application
to reenter Austria from Germany, but thinks a letter from Schenker to Furtwängler would be
more effective.
-
OJ 11/16, [15] Handwritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated September 26, 1934
Furtwängler apologies for not visiting Galtür in the summer; he spent the
vacation on his own work; he will be in Vienna and hopes to see Schenker; he intends to
write publicly about Schenker's work; comments on current political situation. — Finds
Jonas's book excellent.
-
OJ 5/18, 57 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Jonas, dated September 28, 1934
Schenker has written to Furtwängler but doubts whether the latter will be able
to help. — He passes on advice from Robert Haas regarding Hans Wolf's
situation.
-
OJ 5/18, 59 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated October 16, 1934
Schenker cautions Jonas that he detects "something afoot" with Hoboken and his
wife. — Mentions Hans Wolf's reentry problems and reports on German students coming to him.
—An article on Schenker has been included in Spanish Enciclopedia universale. —Reports on
Zuckerkandl, Breisach, von Cube, and Weisse.
-
OC 44/9 Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker dated October 27, 1934
Jonas acknowledges OJ 5/18, 59 and 60; Hoboken has no reason to complain about
his behaviour. — As a result of Hoboken's distribution of complimentary copies, Jonas has
received letters of appreciation. —Reacts critically to Willi Reich and his magazine 23. —
Describes plans for forthcoming events in Hamburg.
-
OJ 12/6, [39] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Jonas to Schenker, dated November 28,
1934
Jonas has agreed to let his publisher proceed with a lawsuit against Willi
Reich; he has written up the documentary evidence of the case and asks Schenker to circulate
it among his circle. — He reports his activities in Berlin. — He reports his dispute with
the Jüdischer Verlag.
-
OJ 12/6, [40] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated December 19, 1934
Jonas encloses a translation of an English review of his book; comments
despairingly. — Lawsuit against Willi Reich comes to court on December 22. — Jonas hopes to
give lectures in Vienna. —Asks if Schenker knows Carl Johann Perl. —Holiday good
wishes.
-
OJ 12/6, [41] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated January 13, 1935
Jonas hopes Schenker is well; ‒ he plans to be in Vienna from 22 to about 28
January; — he is reading the Hildebrand-Fiedler correspondence.
-
OJ 70/3, [1] Handwritten draft of a letter from Moriz Violin to Moriz Rosenthal, undated,
probably dating from c. January 20, 1935]
Violin regrets having failed to honor an agreement with Rosenthal to write an
"outpouring from the heart" regarding Schenker's theory, and proceeds to draft a statement
on the "presuppositions of the Urlinie," which he will re-draft in light of Rosenthal's
comments.
-
OJ 12/6, [43] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Jeanette Schenker, dated March 9, 1935
Jonas thanks Jeanette for the opportunity to look at work of Schenker's
[unspecified]; Jonas, Salzer, and Saturn Verlag wish to bring out a music journal in
Schenker's memory: Jonas requests access to unpublished materials; he inquires whether
Jeanette has reached an understanding with Saturn Verlag over aphorisms.
-
OJ 15/22, [10] Handwritten letter and envelope from Willfort to Jeanette Schenker, dated July 5,
1935
Willfort lays out his plans for an abbreviated edition of Schenker's
Harmonielehre, and explains his negotiations with Alfred Kalmus of UE.
-
OJ 15/22, [11] Handwritten letter and envelope from Willfort to Jeanette Schenker, dated July 18,
1935
Willfort explains his involvement in plans for a re-edition of the Harmonielehre,
and thanks Jeanette for two photographs.
-
OJ 11/16, [17] Typewritten letter from Furtwängler to Jeanette Schenker, dated January 15,
1936
Furtwängler thanks Jeanette Schenker for the gift of Der freie
Satz.
-
OJ 12/24, [12] Handwritten postcard from Kromer to Jeanette Schenker, dated September 18,
1939
Kromer thanks Jeanette for her call and card, reports that Ratz is not in
Vienna.